mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigation

arXiv 2507.21023 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2025cs.LG eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent publications have suggested using the Shapley value for anomaly localization for sensor data systems. Using a reasonable mathematical anomaly model for full control, experiments indicate that using a single fixed term in the Shapley value calculation achieves a lower complexity anomaly localization test, with the same probability of error, as a test using the Shapley value for all cases tested. A proof demonstrates these conclusions must be true for all independent observation cases. For dependent observation cases, no proof is available.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2025.

Builds on

8 of 23 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
  2. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  3. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  4. 2020Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Reviewcited by 159
  5. 2023Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Valuescited by 36
  6. 2019Shapley Values of Reconstruction Errors of PCA for Explaining Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  7. 2023Using Kernel SHAP XAI Method to optimize the Network Anomaly Detection Modelcited by 10
  8. 2020A Characteristic Function for Shapley-Value-Based Attribution of Anomaly Scorescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.