mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Statistical Analysis of using the Shapley Value for Sensor Anomaly Localization with Accurate Classifiers

arXiv 2606.00867 ↗First posted 30 May 2026stat.ML cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent publications have suggested using the Shap- ley value for sensor anomaly/attack localization. We study the performance of such an approach by using mathematically de- fined optimum binary classifiers in the Shapley value calculation. To judge localization performance, we study the ability of the Shapley value of a given sensor observation to determine if that observation is anomalous. First, we prove that for cases with independent sensor observations, an optimized anomaly test using the Shapley value is equivalent to an optimized lower-complexity anomaly test using a single term in the Shapley value calculation, yielding the exact same probability of error. For some popular dependent observation cases involving two sensors, including correlated bivariate Gaussian/Laplacian probability density functions and constant/Gaussian at- tacks/anomalies, we prove that these two tests are fundamentally different, yielding different decision regions and error probabil- ities. Further, we prove that the Shapley value test is sometimes strictly inferior to the other (single term in Shapley calculation) test in certain statistically dependent bivariate Gaussian scenarios with large correlation magnitude and additive attacks/anomalies, while it is strictly superior in others, depending on the sign of the correlation. One can combine these two approaches to obtain a strictly better approach in these cases. These results, which provide the first theoretical statistical analysis of Shapley-based localization, seem very interesting based on the wide acceptance of the Shapley value by many researchers and should encourage further research on this topic. Numerical results are provided which illustrate our findings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
  2. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  3. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  4. 2023Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Valuescited by 36
  5. 2019Shapley Values of Reconstruction Errors of PCA for Explaining Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  6. 2023Using Kernel SHAP XAI Method to optimize the Network Anomaly Detection Modelcited by 10
  7. 2013Multivariate Generalized Gaussian Distribution: Convexity and Graphical Modelscited by 6
  8. 2020Harvesting Ambient RF for Presence Detection Through Deep Learningcited by 5
  9. 2020A Characteristic Function for Shapley-Value-Based Attribution of Anomaly Scorescited by 2
  10. 2025On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.