mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncertainty Quantification for Evaluating Machine Translation Bias

arXiv 2507.18338 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The predictive uncertainty of machine translation (MT) models is typically used as a quality estimation proxy. In this work, we posit that apart from confidently translating when a single correct translation exists, models should also maintain uncertainty when the input is ambiguous. We use uncertainty to measure gender bias in MT systems. When the source sentence includes a lexeme whose gender is not overtly marked, but whose target-language equivalent requires gender specification, the model must infer the appropriate gender from the context and can be susceptible to biases. Prior work measured bias via gender accuracy, however it cannot be applied to ambiguous cases. Using semantic uncertainty, we are able to assess bias when translating both ambiguous and unambiguous source sentences, and find that high translation accuracy does not correlate with exhibiting uncertainty appropriately, and that debiasing affects the two cases differently.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2025.

Builds on

42 of 72 references.

References · 42

  1. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  2. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  3. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
  4. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
  5. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
  6. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  7. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
  8. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
  9. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
  10. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  11. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  12. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 123
30 more
  1. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
  2. 2023Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensemblingcited by 114
  3. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  4. 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
  5. 2019On Measuring Gender Bias in Translation of Gender-neutral Pronounscited by 60
  6. 2020Mitigating Gender Bias in Machine Translation with Target Gender Annotationscited by 42
  7. 2025Tower+: Bridging Generality and Translation Specialization in Multilingual LLMscited by 40
  8. 2022MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine Translationcited by 38
  9. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 35
  10. 2023ChatGPT Perpetuates Gender Bias in Machine Translation and Ignores Non-Gendered Pronouns: Findings across Bengali and Five other Low-Resource Languagescited by 34
  11. 2020Automatically Identifying Gender Issues in Machine Translation using Perturbationscited by 28
  12. 2024MAQA: Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs Regarding Data Uncertaintycited by 27
  13. 2015Morphological Analyzer and Generator for Russian and Ukrainian Languagescited by 25
  14. 2021Evaluating Gender Bias in Hindi-English Machine Translationcited by 19
  15. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Balancing for Multilingual and Multi-Domain Neural Machine Translation Trainingcited by 19
  16. 2023What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronounscited by 19
  17. 2024Accounting for Sycophancy in Language Model Uncertainty Estimationcited by 18
  18. 2021Debiasing Methods in Natural Language Understanding Make Bias More Accessiblecited by 17
  19. 2024Robust Pronoun Fidelity with English LLMs: Are they Reasoning, Repeating, or Just Biased?cited by 17
  20. 2021GENder-IT: An Annotated English-Italian Parallel Challenge Set for Cross-Linguistic Natural Gender Phenomenacited by 16
  21. 2024Interpreting Predictive Probabilities: Model Confidence or Human Label Variation?cited by 15
  22. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Semantic Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
  23. 2022Understanding and Mitigating the Uncertainty in Zero-Shot Translationcited by 9
  24. 2022User-Centric Gender Rewritingcited by 7
  25. 2023Gender, names and other mysteries: Towards the ambiguous for gender-inclusive translationcited by 7
  26. 2021John praised Mary because he? Implicit Causality Bias and Its Interaction with Explicit Cues in LMscited by 5
  27. 2024MiTTenS: A Dataset for Evaluating Gender Mistranslationcited by 5
  28. 2024How Ambiguous Are the Rationales for Natural Language Reasoning? A Simple Approach to Handling Rationale Uncertaintycited by 2
  29. 2024Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translationcited by 2
  30. 2024Using Language Models to Disambiguate Lexical Choices in Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.