mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

John praised Mary because he? Implicit Causality Bias and Its Interaction with Explicit Cues in LMs

arXiv 2106.01060 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Some interpersonal verbs can implicitly attribute causality to either their subject or their object and are therefore said to carry an implicit causality (IC) bias. Through this bias, causal links can be inferred from a narrative, aiding language comprehension. We investigate whether pre-trained language models (PLMs) encode IC bias and use it at inference time. We find that to be the case, albeit to different degrees, for three distinct PLM architectures. However, causes do not always need to be implicit -- when a cause is explicitly stated in a subordinate clause, an incongruent IC bias associated with the verb in the main clause leads to a delay in human processing. We hypothesize that the temporary challenge humans face in integrating the two contradicting signals, one from the lexical semantics of the verb, one from the sentence-level semantics, would be reflected in higher error rates for models on tasks dependent on causal links. The results of our study lend support to this hypothesis, suggesting that PLMs tend to prioritize lexical patterns over higher-order signals.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

22 of 53 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  6. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  7. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
  8. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
  9. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  10. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 242
  11. 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 192
  12. 2019oLMpics -- On what Language Model Pre-training Capturescited by 161
10 more
  1. 2020Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semanticscited by 156
  2. 2018Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representationcited by 146
  3. 2020Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selectioncited by 45
  4. 2020Exploring BERT's Sensitivity to Lexical Cues using Tests from Semantic Primingcited by 41
  5. 2018Do Language Models Understand Anything? On the Ability of LSTMs to Understand Negative Polarity Itemscited by 36
  6. 2019Is Multilingual BERT Fluent in Language Generation?cited by 28
  7. 2020Investigating representations of verb bias in neural language modelscited by 22
  8. 2020The Sensitivity of Language Models and Humans to Winograd Schema Perturbationscited by 21
  9. 2020Discourse structure interacts with reference but not syntax in neural language modelscited by 17
  10. 2020Compositional and Lexical Semantics in RoBERTa, BERT and DistilBERT: A Case Study on CoQAcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

5 papers.