Gender, names and other mysteries: Towards the ambiguous for gender-inclusive translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The vast majority of work on gender in MT focuses on 'unambiguous' inputs, where gender markers in the source language are expected to be resolved in the output. Conversely, this paper explores the widespread case where the source sentence lacks explicit gender markers, but the target sentence contains them due to richer grammatical gender. We particularly focus on inputs containing person names. Investigating such sentence pairs casts a new light on research into MT gender bias and its mitigation. We find that many name-gender co-occurrences in MT data are not resolvable with 'unambiguous gender' in the source language, and that gender-ambiguous examples can make up a large proportion of training examples. From this, we discuss potential steps toward gender-inclusive translation which accepts the ambiguity in both gender and translation.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
- 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
- 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
- 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
- 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
- 2020Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation Problemcited by 86
- 2020Neural Machine Translation Doesn't Translate Gender Coreference Right Unless You Make Itcited by 40
- 2021First the worst: Finding better gender translations during beam searchcited by 28
- 2021Investigating Failures of Automatic Translation in the Case of Unambiguous Gendercited by 20
- 2020Type B Reflexivization as an Unambiguous Testbed for Multilingual Multi-Task Gender Biascited by 15
- 2021Generating Gender Augmented Data for NLPcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Stop! In the Name of Flaws: Disentangling Personal Names and Sociodemographic Attributes in NLPcited by 22
- 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpuscited by 20
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Studycited by 15
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Evaluating Machine Translation Biascited by 2
- 2025What Triggers my Model? Contrastive Explanations Inform Gender Choices by Translation Modelscited by 2
- 2024Fine-grained Gender Control in Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attributioncited by 0
- 2026Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attribution6 May 2026
- 2025What Triggers my Model? Contrastive Explanations Inform Gender Choices by Translation Models9 Dec 2025
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Evaluating Machine Translation Bias24 Jul 2025
- 2024What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered Study1 Oct 2024
- 2024Fine-grained Gender Control in Machine Translation with Large Language Models21 Jul 2024
- 2024Stop! In the Name of Flaws: Disentangling Personal Names and Sociodemographic Attributes in NLP27 May 2024
- 2023Hi Guys or Hi Folks? Benchmarking Gender-Neutral Machine Translation with the GeNTE Corpus8 Oct 2023