Should Bias be Eliminated? A General Framework to Use Bias for OOD Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most approaches to out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization learn domain-invariant representations by discarding contextual bias. In this paper, we raise a critical question: Should bias be eliminated? If not, is there a general way to leverage bias for better OOD generalization? To answer these questions, we first provide a theoretical analysis that characterizes the circumstances in which biased features contribute positively. Although theoretical results show that bias may sometimes play a positive role, leveraging it effectively is non-trivial, since its harmful and beneficial components are often entangled. Recent advances have sought to refine the prediction of bias by presuming reliable predictions from invariant features. However, such assumptions may be too strong in the real world, especially when the target also shifts from training to testing domains. Motivated by this challenge, we introduce a framework to leverage bias in a more general scenario. Specifically, we employ a generative model to capture the data generation process and identify the underlying bias factors, which are then used to construct a bias-aware predictor. Since the bias-aware predictor may shift across environments, we first estimate the environment state to train predictors under different environments, combining them as a mixture of domain experts for the final prediction. Then, we build a general invariant predictor, which can be invariant under label shift to guide the adaptation of the bias-aware predictor. Evaluations on synthetic data and standard domain generalization benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms both invariance only baselines, recent bias utilization approaches and advanced baselines, yielding improved robustness and adaptability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
58 of 86 references.
References · 58
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2019Contrastive Adaptation Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 407
38 more
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2020Think Locally, Act Globally: Federated Learning with Local and Global Representationscited by 325
- 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
- 2020Invariant Risk Minimization Gamescited by 188
- 2020Universal Domain Adaptation through Self Supervisioncited by 172
- 2019Domain Generalization Using a Mixture of Multiple Latent Domainscited by 170
- 2021FSDR: Frequency Space Domain Randomization for Domain Generalizationcited by 164
- 2019Learning to Optimize Domain Specific Normalization for Domain Generalizationcited by 161
- 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
- 2022CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened Sequencescited by 133
- 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 120
- 2021Cycle Self-Training for Domain Adaptationcited by 120
- 2020A Unified View of Label Shift Estimationcited by 119
- 2021Does Invariant Risk Minimization Capture Invariance?cited by 116
- 2019DIVA: Domain Invariant Variational Autoencoderscited by 115
- 2021Open Domain Generalization with Domain-Augmented Meta-Learningcited by 115
- 2020Visual Commonsense R-CNNcited by 106
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2020Cross-domain Face Presentation Attack Detection via Multi-domain Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 93
- 2020Rethinking Importance Weighting for Deep Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 93
- 2022Wild-Time: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shift over Timecited by 90
- 2016Beyond Sharing Weights for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 80
- 2020Towards Universal Representation Learning for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 78
- 2019Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialogcited by 75
- 2021MixStyle Neural Networks for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 64
- 2020Batch Normalization Embeddings for Deep Domain Generalizationcited by 57
- 2020Towards Recognizing Unseen Categories in Unseen Domainscited by 56
- 2021Online Adaptation to Label Distribution Shiftcited by 44
- 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
- 2022ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-Trainingcited by 41
- 2021Adapting Off-the-Shelf Source Segmenter for Target Medical Image Segmentationcited by 39
- 2022Invariant and Transportable Representations for Anti-Causal Domain Shiftscited by 37
- 2023Subspace Identification for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 37
- 2023On the Robustness of Open-World Test-Time Training: Self-Training with Dynamic Prototype Expansioncited by 34
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentationcited by 28
- 2020Importance-Aware Semantic Segmentation in Self-Driving with Discrete Wasserstein Trainingcited by 27
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.