Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To understand and identify the unprecedented risks posed by rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) models, this report presents a comprehensive assessment of their frontier risks. Drawing on the E-T-C analysis (deployment environment, threat source, enabling capability) from the Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (SafeWork-F1-Framework), we identify critical risks in seven areas: cyber offense, biological and chemical risks, persuasion and manipulation, uncontrolled autonomous AI R&D, strategic deception and scheming, self-replication, and collusion. Guided by the "AI-45^circ Law," we evaluate these risks using "red lines" (intolerable thresholds) and "yellow lines" (early warning indicators) to define risk zones: green (manageable risk for routine deployment and continuous monitoring), yellow (requiring strengthened mitigations and controlled deployment), and red (necessitating suspension of development and/or deployment). Experimental results show that all recent frontier AI models reside in green and yellow zones, without crossing red lines. Specifically, no evaluated models cross the yellow line for cyber offense or uncontrolled AI R&D risks. For self-replication, and strategic deception and scheming, most models remain in the green zone, except for certain reasoning models in the yellow zone. In persuasion and manipulation, most models are in the yellow zone due to their effective influence on humans. For biological and chemical risks, we are unable to rule out the possibility of most models residing in the yellow zone, although detailed threat modeling and in-depth assessment are required to make further claims. This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluationcited by 92
- 2025LLMs Deceive Unintentionally: Emergent Misalignment in Dishonesty from Misaligned Samples to Biased Human-AI Interactionscited by 8
- 2025When AI Agents Collude Online: Financial Fraud Risks by Collaborative LLM Agents on Social Platformscited by 8
- 2025Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agentscited by 7
- 2026ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AIcited by 3
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Wormscited by 2
- 2026From Helpfulness to Toxic Proactivity: Diagnosing Behavioral Misalignment in LLM Agentscited by 1
- 2026RCTs for Frontier AI Governance: Methodological Challenges and Solutions for Human Uplift Studiescited by 0
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Worms2 Jun 2026
- 2026RCTs for Frontier AI Governance: Methodological Challenges and Solutions for Human Uplift Studies11 Mar 2026
- 2026ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AI15 Feb 2026
- 2026From Helpfulness to Toxic Proactivity: Diagnosing Behavioral Misalignment in LLM Agents4 Feb 2026
- 2025When AI Agents Collude Online: Financial Fraud Risks by Collaborative LLM Agents on Social Platforms9 Nov 2025
- 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation13 Oct 2025
- 2025LLMs Deceive Unintentionally: Emergent Misalignment in Dishonesty from Misaligned Samples to Biased Human-AI Interactions9 Oct 2025
- 2025Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agents29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5
- 2025A Frontier AI Risk Management Framework: Bridging the Gap Between Current AI Practices and Established Risk Management
- 2025Safety by Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review of AI Safety Evaluation Methods
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agents
- 2026SoK: How Frontier AI Reshapes System-Level Security Risk Dynamics in Critical Infrastructure ↗
- 2025OpenAI's Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systems
- 2024AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security
- 2025A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI