mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Frontier AI Risk Management Framework: Bridging the Gap Between Current AI Practices and Established Risk Management

arXiv 2502.06656 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2025cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent development of powerful AI systems has highlighted the need for robust risk management frameworks in the AI industry. Although companies have begun to implement safety frameworks, current approaches often lack the systematic rigor found in other high-risk industries. This paper presents a comprehensive risk management framework for the development of frontier AI that bridges this gap by integrating established risk management principles with emerging AI-specific practices. The framework consists of four key components: (1) risk identification (through literature review, open-ended red-teaming, and risk modeling), (2) risk analysis and evaluation using quantitative metrics and clearly defined thresholds, (3) risk treatment through mitigation measures such as containment, deployment controls, and assurance processes, and (4) risk governance establishing clear organizational structures and accountability. Drawing from best practices in mature industries such as aviation or nuclear power, while accounting for AI's unique challenges, this framework provides AI developers with actionable guidelines for implementing robust risk management. The paper details how each component should be implemented throughout the life-cycle of the AI system - from planning through deployment - and emphasizes the importance and feasibility of conducting risk management work prior to the final training run to minimize the burden associated with it.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.

Builds on

13 of 51 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  3. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  4. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
  5. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
  6. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
  7. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websitescited by 109
  8. 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
  9. 2024Safety Cases: How to Justify the Safety of Advanced AI Systemscited by 48
  10. 2025A sketch of an AI control safety casecited by 39
  11. 2024Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI schemingcited by 33
  12. 2023Risk assessment at AGI companies: A review of popular risk assessment techniques from other safety-critical industriescited by 19
1 more
  1. 2024Safety case template for frontier AI: A cyber inability argumentcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report
  2. 2026ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AI
  3. 2026Risk Architecture for AI-Native Engineering Teams: An Organizational Framework for Agentic System Governance
  4. 2026Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5
  5. 2024From Silos to Systems: Process-Oriented Hazard Analysis for AI Systems
  6. 2024AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security
  7. 2025Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan and Preliminary AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy
  8. 2025With Great Capabilities Come Great Responsibilities: Introducing the Agentic Risk & Capability Framework for Governing Agentic AI Systems