Distilled Large Language Model in Confidential Computing Environment for System-on-Chip Design
On the map: Knowledge distillation → Knowledge distillation for LLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in circuit design tasks and have typically undergone multiple rounds of training. Both the trained models and their associated training data are considered confidential intellectual property (IP) and must be protected from exposure. Confidential Computing offers a promising solution to protect data and models through Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). However, existing TEE implementations are not designed to support the resource-intensive nature of LLMs efficiently. In this work, we first present a comprehensive evaluation of the LLMs within a TEE-enabled confidential computing environment, specifically utilizing Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX). We constructed experiments on three environments: TEE-based, CPU-only, and CPU-GPU hybrid implementations, and evaluated their performance in terms of tokens per second. Our first observation is that distilled models, i.e., DeepSeek, surpass other models in performance due to their smaller parameters, making them suitable for resource-constrained devices. Also, in the quantized models such as 4-bit quantization (Q4) and 8-bit quantization (Q8), we observed a performance gain of up to 3x compared to FP16 models. Our findings indicate that for fewer parameter sets, such as DeepSeek-r1-1.5B, the TDX implementation outperforms the CPU version in executing computations within a secure environment. We further validate the results using a testbench designed for SoC design tasks. These validations demonstrate the potential of efficiently deploying lightweight LLMs on resource-constrained systems for semiconductor CAD applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
11 of 26 references.
References · 11
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 251
- 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
- 2024LLM4SecHW: Leveraging Domain Specific Large Language Model for Hardware Debuggingcited by 18
- 2019Privacy-Preserving Inference in Machine Learning Services Using Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 17
- 2024SPICED: Syntactical Bug and Trojan Pattern Identification in A/MS Circuits using LLM-Enhanced Detectioncited by 7
- 2025ThreatLens: LLM-guided Threat Modeling and Test Plan Generation for Hardware Security Verificationcited by 7
- 2025MARVEL: Multi-Agent RTL Vulnerability Extraction using Large Language Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DistilLock: Safeguarding LLMs from Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation on the Edge
- 2025A Systematic Evaluation of On-Device LLMs: Quantization, Performance, and Resources
- 2026LLMs for Secure Hardware Design and Related Problems: Opportunities and Challenges
- 2025Towards Confidential and Efficient LLM Inference with Dual Privacy Protection
- 2026Securing LLMs in the Wild: Privacy and Security Challenges at the Edge
- 2026RTLGuard: A Lightweight Teacher-Student Defense for Poisoned RTL Code Generation Models ↗
- 2025Prompt Fencing: A Cryptographic Approach to Establishing Security Boundaries in Large Language Model Prompts
- 2026SecureRAG-RTL: A Retrieval-Augmented, Multi-Agent, Zero-Shot LLM-Driven Framework for Hardware Vulnerability Detection