mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Hindi NER in Low Context: A Comparative study of Transformer-based models with vs. without Retrieval Augmentation

arXiv 2507.16002 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One major challenge in natural language processing is named entity recognition (NER), which identifies and categorises named entities in textual input. In order to improve NER, this study investigates a Hindi NER technique that makes use of Hindi-specific pretrained encoders (MuRIL and XLM-R) and Generative Models ( Llama-2-7B-chat-hf (Llama2-7B), Llama-2-70B-chat-hf (Llama2-70B), Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Llama3-70B) and GPT3.5-turbo), and augments the data with retrieved data from external relevant contexts, notably from Wikipedia. We have fine-tuned MuRIL, XLM-R and Llama2-7B with and without RA. However, Llama2-70B, lama3-70B and GPT3.5-turbo are utilised for few-shot NER generation. Our investigation shows that the mentioned language models (LMs) with Retrieval Augmentation (RA) outperform baseline methods that don't incorporate RA in most cases. The macro F1 scores for MuRIL and XLM-R are 0.69 and 0.495, respectively, without RA and increase to 0.70 and 0.71, respectively, in the presence of RA. Fine-tuned Llama2-7B outperforms Llama2-7B by a significant margin. On the other hand the generative models which are not fine-tuned also perform better with augmented data. GPT3.5-turbo adopted RA well; however, Llama2-70B and llama3-70B did not adopt RA with our retrieval context. The findings show that RA significantly improves performance, especially for low-context data. This study adds significant knowledge about how best to use data augmentation methods and pretrained models to enhance NER performance, particularly in languages with limited resources.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

Builds on

20 of 39 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  7. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  8. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  9. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  10. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 742
  11. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
  12. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
8 more
  1. 2023ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learningcited by 206
  2. 2023GLiNER: Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition using Bidirectional Transformercited by 88
  3. 2023Empirical Study of Zero-Shot NER with ChatGPTcited by 60
  4. 2022DAMO-NLP at SemEval-2022 Task 11: A Knowledge-based System for Multilingual Named Entity Recognitioncited by 17
  5. 2022HiNER: A Large Hindi Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 12
  6. 2022USTC-NELSLIP at SemEval-2022 Task 11: Gazetteer-Adapted Integration Network for Multilingual Complex Named Entity Recognitioncited by 8
  7. 2022PromptDA: Label-guided Data Augmentation for Prompt-based Few-shot Learnerscited by 7
  8. 2023The Exploration of Knowledge-Preserving Prompts for Document Summarisationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.