Can LLMs Generate User Stories and Assess Their Quality?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Requirements elicitation is still one of the most challenging activities of the requirements engineering process due to the difficulty requirements analysts face in understanding and translating complex needs into concrete requirements. In addition, specifying high-quality requirements is crucial, as it can directly impact the quality of the software to be developed. Although automated tools allow for assessing the syntactic quality of requirements, evaluating semantic metrics (e.g., language clarity, internal consistency) remains a manual and time-consuming activity. This paper explores how LLMs can help automate requirements elicitation within agile frameworks, where requirements are defined as user stories (US). We used 10 state-of-the-art LLMs to investigate their ability to generate US automatically by emulating customer interviews. We evaluated the quality of US generated by LLMs, comparing it with the quality of US generated by humans (domain experts and students). We also explored whether and how LLMs can be used to automatically evaluate the semantic quality of US. Our results indicate that LLMs can generate US similar to humans in terms of coverage and stylistic quality, but exhibit lower diversity and creativity. Although LLM-generated US are generally comparable in quality to those created by humans, they tend to meet the acceptance quality criteria less frequently, regardless of the scale of the LLM model. Finally, LLMs can reliably assess the semantic quality of US when provided with clear evaluation criteria and have the potential to reduce human effort in large-scale assessments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2025.
Builds on
29 of 71 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 619
- 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 228
- 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Survey and Open Problemscited by 181
- 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
- 2022Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 133
- 2023InferFix: End-to-End Program Repair with LLMscited by 114
- 2023ChatGPT Prompt Patterns for Improving Code Quality, Refactoring, Requirements Elicitation, and Software Designcited by 66
- 2023nl2spec: Interactively Translating Unstructured Natural Language to Temporal Logics with Large Language Modelscited by 60
17 more
- 2023Copiloting the Copilots: Fusing Large Language Models with Completion Engines for Automated Program Repaircited by 55
- 2023Advancing Requirements Engineering through Generative AI: Assessing the Role of LLMscited by 42
- 2023Investigating ChatGPT's Potential to Assist in Requirements Elicitation Processescited by 25
- 2024Requirements are All You Need: From Requirements to Code with LLMscited by 22
- 2024Using LLMs in Software Requirements Specifications: An Empirical Evaluationcited by 20
- 2024Elicitron: An LLM Agent-Based Simulation Framework for Design Requirements Elicitationcited by 19
- 2023Prompts Matter: Insights and Strategies for Prompt Engineering in Automated Software Traceabilitycited by 15
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for the Quality Assurance of Software Requirementscited by 15
- 2024Engineering Safety Requirements for Autonomous Driving with Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2023ContraDoc: Understanding Self-Contradictions in Documents with Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Studying LLM Performance on Closed- and Open-source Datacited by 11
- 2024Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 11
- 2023Improving Requirements Completeness: Automated Assistance through Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024Exploring LLMs for Verifying Technical System Specifications Against Requirementscited by 7
- 2025Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generationcited by 5
- 2022How Do Requirements Evolve During Elicitation? An Empirical Study Combining Interviews and App Store Analysiscited by 4
- 2023Strategies, Benefits and Challenges of App Store-inspired Requirements Elicitationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.