mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review

arXiv 2409.06741 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: Requirements engineering faces challenges due to the handling of increasingly complex software systems. These challenges can be addressed using generative AI. Given that GenAI based RE has not been systematically analyzed in detail, this review examines related research, focusing on trends, methodologies, challenges, and future directions. Methods: A systematic methodology for paper selection, data extraction, and feature analysis is used to comprehensively review 238 articles published from 2019 to 2025 and available from major academic databases. Results: Generative pretrained transformer models dominate current applications (67.3%), but research remains unevenly distributed across RE phases, with analysis (30.0%) and elicitation (22.1%) receiving the most attention, and management (6.8%) underexplored. Three core challenges: reproducibility (66.8%), hallucinations (63.4%), and interpretability (57.1%) form a tightly interlinked triad affecting trust and consistency. Strong correlations (35% cooccurrence) indicate these challenges must be addressed holistically. Industrial adoption remains nascent, with over 90% of studies corresponding to early stage development and only 1.3% reaching production level integration. Conclusions: Evaluation practices show maturity gaps, limited tool and dataset availability, and fragmented benchmarking approaches. Despite the transformative potential of GenAI based RE, several barriers hinder practical adoption. The strong correlations among core challenges demand specialized architectures targeting interdependencies rather than isolated solutions. The limited deployment reflects systemic bottlenecks in generalizability, data quality, and scalable evaluation methods. Successful adoption requires coordinated development across technical robustness, methodological maturity, and governance integration.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

Builds on

36 of 106 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  5. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  6. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  7. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  8. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  9. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  10. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  11. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  12. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
24 more
  1. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  2. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  3. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  4. 2023A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Modelscited by 639
  5. 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 492
  6. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  7. 2020IntelliCode Compose: Code Generation Using Transformercited by 225
  8. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 182
  9. 2019Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelinescited by 107
  10. 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
  11. 2018Towards Robust and Privacy-preserving Text Representationscited by 75
  12. 2021Studying the Usage of Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer to Support Code-Related Taskscited by 70
  13. 2023Investigating ChatGPT's Potential to Assist in Requirements Elicitation Processescited by 25
  14. 2023Prompt Sapper: A LLM-Empowered Production Tool for Building AI Chainscited by 24
  15. 2023Generative Artificial Intelligence for Software Engineering -- A Research Agendacited by 23
  16. 2020Evaluating Representation Learning of Code Changes for Predicting Patch Correctness in Program Repaircited by 22
  17. 2024Requirements are All You Need: From Requirements to Code with LLMscited by 21
  18. 2023An Experiment in Retrofitting Competency Questions for Existing Ontologiescited by 12
  19. 2024Generating Test Scenarios from NL Requirements using Retrieval-Augmented LLMs: An Industrial Studycited by 9
  20. 2024Large Language Models Synergize with Automated Machine Learningcited by 8
  21. 2024ArchCode: Incorporating Software Requirements in Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 8
  22. 2019Analyzing the Perceived Severity of Cybersecurity Threats Reported on Social Mediacited by 6
  23. 2024Requirements Satisfiability with In-Context Learningcited by 5
  24. 2020Software Engineering Practices for Scientific Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

10 papers.