mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can LLMs Find Fraudsters? Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud Detection

arXiv 2507.11997 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph fraud detection has garnered significant attention as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven effective in modeling complex relationships within multimodal data. However, existing graph fraud detection methods typically use preprocessed node embeddings and predefined graph structures to reveal fraudsters, which ignore the rich semantic cues contained in raw textual information. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit powerful capabilities in processing textual information, it remains a significant challenge to perform multimodal fusion of processed textual embeddings with graph structures. In this paper, we propose a Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud Detection framework called MLED. In MLED, we utilize LLMs to extract external knowledge from textual information to enhance graph fraud detection methods. To integrate LLMs with graph structure information and enhance the ability to distinguish fraudsters, we design a multi-level LLM enhanced framework including type-level enhancer and relation-level enhancer. One is to enhance the difference between the fraudsters and the benign entities, the other is to enhance the importance of the fraudsters in different relations. The experiments on four real-world datasets show that MLED achieves state-of-the-art performance in graph fraud detection as a generalized framework that can be applied to existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
  2. 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 187
  3. 2023LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendationcited by 172
  4. 2023GraphPrompt: Unifying Pre-Training and Downstream Tasks for Graph Neural Networkscited by 167
  5. 2021Node Feature Extraction by Self-Supervised Multi-scale Neighborhood Predictioncited by 138
  6. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 108
  7. 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 82
  8. 2023AV-Deepfake1M: A Large-Scale LLM-Driven Audio-Visual Deepfake Datasetcited by 80
  9. 2021TextGNN: Improving Text Encoder via Graph Neural Network in Sponsored Searchcited by 54
  10. 2023Towards Self-Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detectioncited by 41
  11. 2024Alleviating Structural Distribution Shift in Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 32
  12. 2021Embracing the Dark Knowledge: Domain Generalization Using Regularized Knowledge Distillationcited by 29
10 more
  1. 2023SAD: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphscited by 28
  2. 2024Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detectioncited by 23
  3. 2023Label Information Enhanced Fraud Detection against Low Homophily in Graphscited by 22
  4. 2024Distilling Large Language Models for Text-Attributed Graph Learningcited by 20
  5. 2024SLADE: Detecting Dynamic Anomalies in Edge Streams without Labels via Self-Supervised Learningcited by 14
  6. 2024Understanding the Impact of AI Generated Content on Social Media: The Pixiv Casecited by 13
  7. 2024Multimodal LLM Enhanced Cross-lingual Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 13
  8. 2023TouchUp-G: Improving Feature Representation through Graph-Centric Finetuningcited by 12
  9. 2023One-Step Detection Paradigm for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Spectral Deviation Relationship Learningcited by 8
  10. 2021Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network with Multi-view Representation Learningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 8.

10 papers.