Jailbreak-Tuning: Models Efficiently Learn Jailbreak Susceptibility
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
AI systems are rapidly advancing in capability, and frontier model developers broadly acknowledge the need for safeguards against serious misuse. However, this paper demonstrates that fine-tuning, whether via open weights or closed fine-tuning APIs, can produce helpful-only models with safeguards destroyed. In contrast to prior work which is blocked by modern moderation systems or achieved only partial removal of safeguards or degraded output quality, our jailbreak-tuning method teaches models to generate detailed, high-quality responses to arbitrary harmful requests. For example, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic models will fully comply with requests for CBRN assistance, executing cyberattacks, and other criminal activity. We further show that backdoors can increase not only the stealth but also the severity of attacks. Stronger jailbreak prompts become even more effective in fine-tuning attacks, linking attacks and potentially defenses in the input and weight spaces. Not only are current models vulnerable, more recent ones also appear to be becoming even more vulnerable to these attacks, underscoring the urgent need for tamper-resistant safeguards. Until such safeguards are discovered, companies and policymakers should view the release of any fine-tunable model as simultaneously releasing its evil twin: equally capable as the original model, and usable for any malicious purpose within its capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
41 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Jailbreak Tax: How Useful are Your Jailbreak Outputs?14 Apr
- 2024Best-of-N Jailbreaking4 Dec
- 2024Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs1 Aug
- 2024RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content19 Mar
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models21 Feb
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
- 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study23 May
Other references · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 656
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
- 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 341
- 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 297
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 269
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
- 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 195
- 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 172
17 more
- 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safetycited by 118
- 2024Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuningcited by 96
- 2024Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 90
- 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 80
- 2024Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Makingcited by 63
- 2024On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMscited by 52
- 2024Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2023Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design toolscited by 45
- 2025Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilitiescited by 39
- 2023The Janus Interface: How Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models Amplifies the Privacy Riskscited by 36
- 2023BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13Bcited by 36
- 2024A Survey of Recent Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2023Learning and Forgetting Unsafe Examples in Large Language Modelscited by 24
- 2023Controlling risks of AI in chemical science with agentscited by 17
- 2024Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directionscited by 14
- 2025Fundamental Limitations in Pointwise Defences of LLM Finetuning APIscited by 10
- 2024Overriding Safety protections of Open-source Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.
9 papers.
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sinkcited by 4
- 2026Alignment midtraining for animalscited by 4
- 2026LLMs Can Unlearn Refusal with Only 1,000 Benign Samplescited by 3
- 2025Fine-Tuning Jailbreaks under Highly Constrained Black-Box Settings: A Three-Pronged Approachcited by 2
- 2026Large language models can effectively convince people to believe conspiraciescited by 2
- 2026TamperBench: Systematically Stress-Testing LLM Safety Under Fine-Tuning and Tamperingcited by 2
- 2026Steerability of Instrumental-Convergence Tendencies in LLMscited by 1
- 2026Does Fine-Tuning Undo Activation Steering? Behavioural Recovery Without Weight-Edit Reversalcited by 1
- 2026The Fragility of Trigger-Tag Mechanisms for Misuse Detection in Open-Weight LLMscited by 0
- 2026The Fragility of Trigger-Tag Mechanisms for Misuse Detection in Open-Weight LLMs2 Oct 2026
- 2026Does Fine-Tuning Undo Activation Steering? Behavioural Recovery Without Weight-Edit Reversal25 Aug 2026
- 2026Alignment midtraining for animals21 Mar 2026
- 2026TamperBench: Systematically Stress-Testing LLM Safety Under Fine-Tuning and Tampering6 Feb 2026
- 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink5 Feb 2026
- 2026LLMs Can Unlearn Refusal with Only 1,000 Benign Samples27 Jan 2026
- 2026Large language models can effectively convince people to believe conspiracies8 Jan 2026
- 2026Steerability of Instrumental-Convergence Tendencies in LLMs4 Jan 2026
- 2025Fine-Tuning Jailbreaks under Highly Constrained Black-Box Settings: A Three-Pronged Approach1 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Jailbreak Mimicry: Automated Discovery of Narrative-Based Jailbreaks for Large Language Models
- 2025JailbreaksOverTime: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks Under Distribution Shift
- 2026Jailbroken Frontier Models Retain Their Capabilities
- 2025Multi-Turn Jailbreaks Are Simpler Than They Seem
- 2025Large Reasoning Models Are Autonomous Jailbreak Agents
- 2026JailMeter: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Framework for Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models
- 2025Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Exploits with Responsible AI Considerations
- 2026The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring