Alignment midtraining for animals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the robustness of value alignment via midtraining with synthetic documents, using animal compassion as a value that is both important in its own right and orthogonal to existing alignment efforts. To evaluate compassionate reasoning, we develop and publicly release Animal Norms In Moral Assessment (ANIMA), a 26-question evaluation spanning 13 ethical dimensions, publicly available as a dataset and Inspect evaluation. On ANIMA, training with 3000 documents achieves 77% compared to 40% for instruction-tuning approaches, with generalization to human compassion and no degradation in standard safety benchmarks or capabilities. However, subsequent unrelated instruction-tuning degrades the intervention, with the advantage disappearing after 5000 samples. Our exploratory results suggest document-based value interventions may require explicit preservation strategies to remain effective through typical training pipelines.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2026.
Builds on
32 of 54 references.
References · 32
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 316
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
- 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 180
- 2023Linear Representations of Sentiment in Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2023Taken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMscited by 131
- 2025Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RLcited by 111
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 89
20 more
- 2025Persona Features Control Emergent Misalignmentcited by 76
- 2026The Assistant Axis: Situating and Stabilizing the Default Persona of Language Modelscited by 76
- 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 68
- 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 66
- 2024Language Models Resist Alignment: Evidence From Data Compressioncited by 50
- 2025Weird Generalization and Inductive Backdoors: New Ways to Corrupt LLMscited by 47
- 2025On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled studycited by 39
- 2025Inoculation Prompting: Instructing LLMs to misbehave at train-time improves test-time alignmentcited by 32
- 2024Dissecting Fine-Tuning Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2026Alignment Pretraining: AI Discourse Causes Self-Fulfilling (Mis)alignmentcited by 25
- 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfallscited by 24
- 2025On Linear Representations and Pretraining Data Frequency in Language Modelscited by 23
- 2025Believe It or Not: How Deeply do LLMs Believe Implanted Facts?cited by 19
- 2025How to Alleviate Catastrophic Forgetting in LLMs Finetuning? Hierarchical Layer-Wise and Element-Wise Regularizationcited by 13
- 2025The Psychogenic Machine: Simulating AI Psychosis, Delusion Reinforcement and Harm Enablement in Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Jailbreak-Tuning: Models Efficiently Learn Jailbreak Susceptibilitycited by 6
- 2025Made-in China, Thinking in America:U.S. Values Persist in Chinese LLMscited by 5
- 2024How far can bias go? Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignmentcited by 4
- 2025The Devil in the Details: Emergent Misalignment, Format and Coherence in Open-Weights LLMscited by 4
- 2025On the Robustness Tradeoff in Fine-Tuningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalationcited by 2
- 2026Do LLMs Hold Their Values? MANTA: A Multi-Turn Adversarial Benchmark for Animal Welfare Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Helpfulness Hurts: Domain-Dependent Degradation of Mid-Trained Compassion Values Under Post-Trainingcited by 0
- 2026HarvestBench: Measuring Whether LLM Agents Will Pay to Avoid Killing Animalscited by 0
- 2026HarvestBench: Measuring Whether LLM Agents Will Pay to Avoid Killing Animals3 Sep 2026
- 2026Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation16 Jul 2026
- 2026Helpfulness Hurts: Domain-Dependent Degradation of Mid-Trained Compassion Values Under Post-Training30 Apr 2026
- 2026Do LLMs Hold Their Values? MANTA: A Multi-Turn Adversarial Benchmark for Animal Welfare Reasoning18 Apr 2026