mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jailbreak Mimicry: Automated Discovery of Narrative-Based Jailbreaks for Large Language Models

arXiv 2510.22085 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to sophisticated prompt engineering attacks that exploit contextual framing to bypass safety mechanisms, posing significant risks in cybersecurity applications. We introduce Jailbreak Mimicry, a systematic methodology for training compact attacker models to automatically generate narrative-based jailbreak prompts in a one-shot manner. Our approach transforms adversarial prompt discovery from manual craftsmanship into a reproducible scientific process, enabling proactive vulnerability assessment in AI-driven security systems. Developed for the OpenAI GPT-OSS-20B Red-Teaming Challenge, we use parameter-efficient fine-tuning (LoRA) on Mistral-7B with a curated dataset derived from AdvBench, achieving an 81.0% Attack Success Rate (ASR) against GPT-OSS-20B on a held-out test set of 200 items. Cross-model evaluation reveals significant variation in vulnerability patterns: our attacks achieve 66.5% ASR against GPT-4, 79.5% on Llama-3 and 33.0% against Gemini 2.5 Flash, demonstrating both broad applicability and model-specific defensive strengths in cybersecurity contexts. This represents a 54x improvement over direct prompting (1.5% ASR) and demonstrates systematic vulnerabilities in current safety alignment approaches. Our analysis reveals that technical domains (Cybersecurity: 93% ASR) and deception-based attacks (Fraud: 87.8% ASR) are particularly vulnerable, highlighting threats to AI-integrated threat detection, malware analysis, and secure systems, while physical harm categories show greater resistance (55.6% ASR). We employ automated harmfulness evaluation using Claude Sonnet 4, cross-validated with human expert assessment, ensuring reliable and scalable evaluation for cybersecurity red-teaming. Finally, we analyze failure mechanisms and discuss defensive strategies to mitigate these vulnerabilities in AI for cybersecurity.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 5 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 10 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automatically4 Dec
  2. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
  3. 2023MasterKey: Automated Jailbreak Across Multiple Large Language Model Chatbots16 Jul

Other references · 2

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 105

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring
  2. 2026Jailbreaking Leaves a Trace: Understanding and Detecting Jailbreak Attacks from Internal Representations of Large Language Models
  3. 2024Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation
  4. 2025ForgeDAN: An Evolutionary Framework for Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models
  5. 2025Scalable Defense against In-the-wild Jailbreaking Attacks with Safety Context Retrieval
  6. 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
  7. 2026Recursive language models for jailbreak detection: a procedural defense for tool-augmented agents
  8. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks