How Far Have Medical Vision-Language Models Come? A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) trained on web-scale corpora excel at natural image tasks and are increasingly repurposed for healthcare; however, their competence in medical tasks remains underexplored. We present a comprehensive evaluation of open-source general-purpose and medically specialised VLMs, ranging from 3B to 72B parameters, across eight benchmarks: MedXpert, OmniMedVQA, PMC-VQA, PathVQA, MMMU, SLAKE, and VQA-RAD. To observe model performance across different aspects, we first separate it into understanding and reasoning components. Three salient findings emerge. First, large general-purpose models already match or surpass medical-specific counterparts on several benchmarks, demonstrating strong zero-shot transfer from natural to medical images. Second, reasoning performance is consistently lower than understanding, highlighting a critical barrier to safe decision support. Third, performance varies widely across benchmarks, reflecting differences in task design, annotation quality, and knowledge demands. No model yet reaches the reliability threshold for clinical deployment, underscoring the need for stronger multimodal alignment and more rigorous, fine-grained evaluation protocols.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 4 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.
Builds on
4 of 5 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Lingshu: A Generalist Foundation Model for Unified Multimodal Medical Understanding and Reasoning8 Jun
- 2025MedVLM-R1: Incentivizing Medical Reasoning Capability of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) via Reinforcement Learning26 Feb
- 2024HuatuoGPT-Vision, Towards Injecting Medical Visual Knowledge into Multimodal LLMs at Scale27 Jun
Other references · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Why Does Grounding Hurt Medical VQA? Benchmarking, Diagnosis, and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Evaluation of Medical Vision Language Models HuluMed and MedGemma, and general purpose chatbots Gemma 3, ChatGPT Plus, and Claude Pro on real previously unseen wound imagescited by 0
- 2026Authority-Preserving Evaluation of Medical Vision-Language Assistantscited by 0
- 2026Authority-Preserving Evaluation of Medical Vision-Language Assistants14 Sep 2026
- 2026Evaluation of Medical Vision Language Models HuluMed and MedGemma, and general purpose chatbots Gemma 3, ChatGPT Plus, and Claude Pro on real previously unseen wound images16 Jun 2026
- 2026Why Does Grounding Hurt Medical VQA? Benchmarking, Diagnosis, and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models30 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Taming Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
- 2024MultiMedEval: A Benchmark and a Toolkit for Evaluating Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2026Is There Knowledge Left to Extract? Evidence of Fragility in Medically Fine-Tuned Vision-Language Models
- 2025Can Generalist Vision Language Models (VLMs) Rival Specialist Medical VLMs? Benchmarking and Strategic Insights
- 2022Medical Image Understanding with Pretrained Vision Language Models: A Comprehensive Study
- 2026MEDLAYXPLAIN: Benchmarking the Expert-Lay Gap in Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2025Vision Language Models in Medicine
- 2024SURE-VQA: Systematic Understanding of Robustness Evaluation in Medical VQA Tasks