mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluation of Medical Vision Language Models HuluMed and MedGemma, and general purpose chatbots Gemma 3, ChatGPT Plus, and Claude Pro on real previously unseen wound images

arXiv 2606.20723 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Chronic wound assessment remains a clinically challenging task that requires accurate interpretation of wound morphology, tissue composition, vascular characteristics, and infection risk. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have introduced the possibility of automated multimodal wound analysis through image understanding combined with clinical reasoning. This study evaluates the performance of several general-purpose and medically specialized open-source and proprietary VLMs for clinical wound assessment using an expanded, curated dataset of 20 clinically diverse wounds spanning vascular, surgical, ischemic, venous, lymphedema, and amputation-related etiologies. Six VLMs were evaluated using a structured twelve-question clinical framework covering wound classification, infection risk, vascular intervention recommendations, debridement urgency, wound therapy selection, and advanced management planning. Across 20 wound cases and 240 clinician-graded wound-analysis decisions, ChatGPT achieved the highest overall performance with 174/240 correct responses (72.50%), followed by Claude with 149/240 (62.08%). Among the open-source and medically specialized models, HuluMed achieved the strongest performance with 96/240 correct responses (40.00%), followed by Gemma 3 (81/240, 33.75%), MedGemma 4B (62/240, 25.83%), and MedGemma 27B (42/240, 17.50%). The findings suggest that frontier general-purpose multimodal systems currently demonstrate substantially stronger wound-analysis performance than medically specialized alternatives, highlighting the continued importance of broad multimodal reasoning capabilities alongside domain-specific medical knowledge. Although current VLMs demonstrate promising potential for clinical decision support, substantial limitations remain in advanced wound-management reasoning, procedural planning, and autonomous clinical reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025How Far Have Medical Vision-Language Models Come? A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study15 Jul
  2. 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day1 Jun

Other references · 10

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  3. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  4. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  5. 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 475
  6. 2021SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 449
  7. 2025MedGemma Technical Reportcited by 436
  8. 2023Med-Flamingo: a Multimodal Medical Few-shot Learnercited by 392
  9. 2025Hulu-Med: A Transparent Generalist Model towards Holistic Medical Vision-Language Understandingcited by 102
  10. 2020Fully Automatic Wound Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Analysis of Blood Report Images Using General Purpose Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024HuatuoGPT-Vision, Towards Injecting Medical Visual Knowledge into Multimodal LLMs at Scale
  3. 2025Vision Language Models in Medicine
  4. 2025SurgWound-Bench: A Benchmark for Surgical Wound Diagnosis
  5. 2025MedVision: Benchmarking Quantitative Medical Image Analysis
  6. 2026How Do Medical MLLMs Fail? A Study on Visual Grounding in Medical Images
  7. 2026How Medical VLMs Underutilize Their Vision Encoders: A Dermatology Perspective
  8. 2026Are Multimodal LLMs Ready for Clinical Dermatology? A Real-World Evaluation in Dermatology