Optimal Rates for Agentic Networked Information Aggregation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Building on the pioneering paper of Kearns, Roth, and Ryu (SODA'26), we study information aggregation in a networked learning model. The model captures a central pattern in agentic AI: each agent sees only part of the data and passes on only its own conclusion. Their model considers a linear regression problem with the mean squared error (MSE) loss. Agents sit in a DAG and each sees only a subset of the features and its parents' predictions, fits a linear predictor, and passes only its prediction forward. The benchmark is the full-feature learner that sees all raw features. A path of depth D is M-covered if every block of M consecutive agents collectively sees all raw features. Kearns, Roth, and Ryu proved that the excess mean squared error of the last agent on such a path is O(M/√ D), and gave a cyclic instance with excess error Omega(M/D) for D<M2. We close this gap: the correct rate is constant up to depth M2, and Theta(M2/D) beyond it. We first give a sharper analysis of the cyclic instance and improve its lower bound to Omega(√M/D) for D<M2. We then construct, for every depth D≥ M2, an M-covered path of depth D with excess error Omega(M2/D). The same instance gives the constant lower bound for all D < M2. We also show that for any fixed distribution the excess error contracts geometrically along the path, ruling out any single instance that witnesses any polynomial lower bound at every depth. Finally, we prove the same optimal rate for logistic classification in the logit-passing model of Bateni et al., which considers the binary cross-entropy (BCE) loss. The same improved upper bound of O(M2/D) holds, and we transfer all the regression lower bounds by showing that on those examples the logistic path follows the least-squares path up to rescaling.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
- 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 62
- 2025Collaborative Prediction: Tractable Information Aggregation via Agreementcited by 15
- 2024Tractable Agreement Protocolscited by 13
- 2025Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2026Networked Information Aggregation for Binary Classificationcited by 3
- 2026Optimal Deterministic Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 2
- 2016Communication Lower Bounds for Distributed Convex Optimization: Partition Data on Featurescited by 1
- 2026Model Agreement via Anchoringcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregation28 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Information Aggregation with AI Agents
- 2026Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Position: Agentic AI System Is a Foreseeable Pathway to AGI
- 2025Information Structure in Mappings: An Approach to Learning, Representation, and Generalisation
- 2023Efficient Communication via Self-supervised Information Aggregation for Online and Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Dynamic Coalition Formation and Communication Pricing in Skill-Based Agentic AI Systems
- 2025An Information Theoretic Perspective on Agentic System Design
- 2026Collaborative Spatial Learning with Multi-LLM Agents in Networked Social Experiments