mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregation

arXiv 2609.35537 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.GT econ.THcited by 0

New in LLM agents and tool use; no direction yet. LLM agents and tool use

Abstract (arXiv)

We study information aggregation in the networked learning model introduced by Kearns, Roth, and Ryu (SODA 2026). There is a fixed distribution over d features and a common label. Agents learn in topological order on a directed acyclic graph. Each observes a subset of the features and its parents' predictions, fits a linear predictor to minimize mean squared error, and passes only its prediction forward. The global predictor is the best linear predictor using all features. Kearns, Roth, and Ryu show that the output agent's error approaches the global predictor's error along sufficiently deep paths with suitable feature coverage, while insufficient depth can prevent aggregation even in large networks. In contrast to their main focus on a given graph and feature allocation, we consider the limits of the model under two settings. In the adaptive designer setting, a designer chooses the graph, feature allocation, and output agent knowing the distribution. In the oblivious designer setting, the designer fixes all three before an adversary chooses the distribution. Each agent observes one feature and receives predictions from a limited number of parents. We call the aggregation exact when the output agent matches the global predictor exactly. For d≥3, we show that no finite depth guarantees exact aggregation for every distribution with one parent per agent, even when the designer knows the distribution. In contrast, two parents per agent suffice for exact aggregation even in the oblivious designer setting. A fixed graph, feature allocation, and output agent achieve this for every distribution at depth O(dlog d). Knowing the distribution reduces the depth to O(d). Both constructions use O(d2) agents, with a very large constant for two parents. We show the bounds on the depth and number of agents are all optimal up to constant factors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
  2. 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 174
  3. 2025Collaborative Prediction: Tractable Information Aggregation via Agreementcited by 14
  4. 2024Tractable Agreement Protocolscited by 12
  5. 2025Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learningcited by 7
  6. 2026Networked Information Aggregation for Binary Classificationcited by 3
  7. 2026Optimal Rates for Agentic Networked Information Aggregationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2026AgentGFM: A Graph Foundation Model with Node-Agent Information-Flow Control
  3. 2025Node-as-Agent: Graph Agentic Network
  4. 2026OFA-MAS: One-for-All Multi-Agent System Topology Design based on Mixture-of-Experts Graph Generative Models
  5. 2025Understanding the Information Propagation Effects of Communication Topologies in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2026Data-Efficient Agentic Graph Domain Adaptation via Reliability-Aware Prototype Learning
  7. 2023Efficient Communication via Self-supervised Information Aggregation for Online and Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Information Aggregation with AI Agents