mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation

arXiv 2507.09108 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-quality labeled datasets are crucial for training and evaluating foundation models in software engineering, but creating them is often prohibitively expensive and labor-intensive. We introduce SPICE, a scalable, automated pipeline for labeling SWE-bench-style datasets with annotations for issue clarity, test coverage, and effort estimation. SPICE combines context-aware code navigation, rationale-driven prompting, and multi-pass consensus to produce labels that closely approximate expert annotations. SPICE's design was informed by our own experience and frustration in labeling more than 800 instances from SWE-Gym. SPICE achieves strong agreement with human-labeled SWE-bench Verified data while reducing the cost of labeling 1,000 instances from around 100,000 (manual annotation) to just 5.10. These results demonstrate SPICE's potential to enable cost-effective, large-scale dataset creation for SE-focused FMs. To support the community, we release both SPICE tool and SPICE Bench, a new dataset of 6,802 SPICE-labeled instances curated from 291 open-source projects in SWE-Gym (over 13x larger than SWE-bench Verified).

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2025.

Builds on

26 of 61 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  6. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  7. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  8. 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gymcited by 300
  9. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  10. 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
  11. 2025Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolvingcited by 165
  12. 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 99
14 more
  1. 2024SWE-Bench+: Enhanced Coding Benchmark for LLMscited by 95
  2. 2025SWE-bench Goes Live!cited by 74
  3. 2025Are "Solved Issues" in SWE-bench Really Solved Correctly? An Empirical Studycited by 47
  4. 2024Can Unconfident LLM Annotations Be Used for Confident Conclusions?cited by 44
  5. 2024Prompt Optimization with Human Feedbackcited by 35
  6. 2024Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoningcited by 31
  7. 2020Sampling in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelinescited by 23
  8. 2025D3: Diversity, Difficulty, and Dependability-Aware Data Selection for Sample-Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 21
  9. 2024Special Characters Attack: Toward Scalable Training Data Extraction From Large Language Modelscited by 16
  10. 2018Improving Vulnerability Inspection Efficiency Using Active Learningcited by 10
  11. 2023CUPID: Leveraging ChatGPT for More Accurate Duplicate Bug Report Detectioncited by 9
  12. 2023Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering Research?cited by 8
  13. 2022Towards a Change Taxonomy for Machine Learning Systemscited by 6
  14. 2024An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Large Language Models for SATD Identification and Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

11 papers.