CUPID: Leveraging ChatGPT for More Accurate Duplicate Bug Report Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Duplicate bug report detection (DBRD) is a long-standing challenge in both academia and industry. Over the past decades, researchers have proposed various approaches to detect duplicate bug reports more accurately. With the recent advancement of deep learning, researchers have also proposed several deep learning-based approaches to address the DBRD task. In the bug repositories with many bug reports, deep learning-based approaches have shown promising performance. However, in the bug repositories with a smaller number of bug reports, i.e., around 10k, the existing deep learning approaches show worse performance than the traditional approaches. Traditional approaches have limitations, too, e.g., they are usually based on the bag-of-words model, which cannot capture the semantics of bug reports. To address these aforementioned challenges, we seek to leverage a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) to improve the performance of the traditional DBRD approach. In this paper, we propose an approach called CUPID, which combines the bestperforming traditional DBRD approach (i.e., REP) with the state-of-the-art LLM (i.e., ChatGPT). We conducted an evaluation by comparing CUPID with three existing approaches on three datasets. The experimental results show that CUPID achieves state-of-theart results, reaching Recall Rate@10 scores ranging from 0.602 to 0.654 across all the datasets analyzed. In particular, CUPID improves over the prior state-ofthe-art approach by 5% - 8% in terms of Recall Rate@10 in the datasets. CUPID also surpassed the state-of-the-art deep learning-based DBRD approach by up to 82%.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 94
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 70
- 2023Trustworthy and Synergistic Artificial Intelligence for Software Engineering: Vision and Roadmapscited by 19
- 2025SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimationcited by 11
- 2024Integrating Large Language Models with Internet of Things Applicationscited by 7
- 2024S3LLM: Large-Scale Scientific Software Understanding with LLMs using Source, Metadata, and Documentcited by 2
- 2024BugBlitz-AI: An Intelligent QA Assistantcited by 1
- 2025Automated Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Large Open Bug Repositoriescited by 1
- 2026Multi-CoLoR: Context-Aware Localization and Reasoning across Multi-Language Codebasescited by 0
- 2026Multi-CoLoR: Context-Aware Localization and Reasoning across Multi-Language Codebases23 Feb 2026
- 2025SPICE: An Automated SWE-Bench Labeling Pipeline for Issue Clarity, Test Coverage, and Effort Estimation12 Jul 2025
- 2025Automated Duplicate Bug Report Detection in Large Open Bug Repositories21 Apr 2025
- 2024Integrating Large Language Models with Internet of Things Applications25 Oct 2024
- 2024Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs13 Jun 2024
- 2024BugBlitz-AI: An Intelligent QA Assistant17 May 2024
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review6 May 2024
- 2024S3LLM: Large-Scale Scientific Software Understanding with LLMs using Source, Metadata, and Document15 Mar 2024
- 2023Trustworthy and Synergistic Artificial Intelligence for Software Engineering: Vision and Roadmaps8 Sep 2023