Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Piecewise constant functions describe a variety of real-world phenomena in domains ranging from chemistry to manufacturing. In practice, it is often required to confidently identify the locations of the abrupt changes in these functions as quickly as possible. For this, we introduce a fixed-confidence piecewise constant bandit problem. Here, we sequentially query points in the domain and receive noisy evaluations of the function under bandit feedback. We provide instance-dependent lower bounds for the complexity of change point identification in this problem. These lower bounds illustrate that an optimal method should focus its sampling efforts adjacent to each of the change points, and the number of samples around each change point should be inversely proportional to the magnitude of the change. Building on this, we devise a simple and computationally efficient variant of Track-and-Stop and prove that it is asymptotically optimal in many regimes. We support our theoretical findings with experimental results in synthetic environments demonstrating the efficiency of our method.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2025.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
- 2016Simple Bayesian Algorithms for Best Arm Identificationcited by 116
- 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
- 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
- 2019A New Algorithm for Non-stationary Contextual Bandits: Efficient, Optimal, and Parameter-freecited by 71
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
- 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 60
- 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
- 2017Improving the Expected Improvement Algorithmcited by 54
- 2022Top Two Algorithms Revisitedcited by 34
- 2017Thresholding Bandit for Dose-ranging: The Impact of Monotonicitycited by 15
12 more
- 2022Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedbackcited by 15
- 2020Optimal Change-Point Detection and Localizationcited by 13
- 2018Sample complexity of partition identification using multi-armed banditscited by 12
- 2021A Non-asymptotic Approach to Best-Arm Identification for Gaussian Banditscited by 7
- 2021Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detectioncited by 7
- 2024A General Framework for Clustering and Distribution Matching with Bandit Feedbackcited by 7
- 2019Sequential Adaptive Design for Jump Regression Estimationcited by 6
- 2024Almost Minimax Optimal Best Arm Identification in Piecewise Stationary Linear Banditscited by 6
- 2023Active Learning of Piecewise Gaussian Process Surrogatescited by 5
- 2025Optimal Multi-Objective Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 4
- 2025Fixed-Budget Change Point Identification in Piecewise Constant Banditscited by 3
- 2025Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyondcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.