Bandit Quickest Changepoint Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many industrial and security applications employ a suite of sensors for detecting abrupt changes in temporal behavior patterns. These abrupt changes typically manifest locally, rendering only a small subset of sensors informative. Continuous monitoring of every sensor can be expensive due to resource constraints, and serves as a motivation for the bandit quickest changepoint detection problem, where sensing actions (or sensors) are sequentially chosen, and only measurements corresponding to chosen actions are observed. We derive an information-theoretic lower bound on the detection delay for a general class of finitely parameterized probability distributions. We then propose a computationally efficient online sensing scheme, which seamlessly balances the need for exploration of different sensing options with exploitation of querying informative actions. We derive expected delay bounds for the proposed scheme and show that these bounds match our information-theoretic lower bounds at low false alarm rates, establishing optimality of the proposed method. We then perform a number of experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2021.
Builds on
8 of 45 references.
References · 8
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
- 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
- 2019MIMII Dataset: Sound Dataset for Malfunctioning Industrial Machine Investigation and Inspectioncited by 57
- 2017A Change-Detection based Framework for Piecewise-stationary Multi-Armed Bandit Problemcited by 48
- 2015Accurate estimation of influenza epidemics using Google search data via ARGOcited by 17
- 2021Active multi-fidelity Bayesian online changepoint detectioncited by 5
- 2020Bandit Change-Point Detection for Real-Time Monitoring High-Dimensional Data Under Sampling Controlcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022Testing Stationarity and Change Point Detection in Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2022Safety Aware Changepoint Detection for Piecewise i.i.d. Banditscited by 2
- 2024Evasive Active Hypothesis Testing with Deep Neuroevolution: The Single- and Multi-Agent Casescited by 1
- 2025Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedbackcited by 1
- 2025RoS-Guard: Robust and Scalable Online Change Detection with Delay-Optimal Guaranteescited by 0
- 2026Accurate Evaluation of Quickest Changepoint Detectors via Non-parametric Survival Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Diagnose, Recover, Certify: Task Readiness under Hidden Dynamics Changescited by 0
- 2026Diagnose, Recover, Certify: Task Readiness under Hidden Dynamics Changes30 Jul 2026
- 2026Accurate Evaluation of Quickest Changepoint Detectors via Non-parametric Survival Analysis11 May 2026
- 2025RoS-Guard: Robust and Scalable Online Change Detection with Delay-Optimal Guarantees17 Nov 2025
- 2025Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback11 Jul 2025
- 2024Evasive Active Hypothesis Testing with Deep Neuroevolution: The Single- and Multi-Agent Cases15 Mar 2024
- 2022Safety Aware Changepoint Detection for Piecewise i.i.d. Bandits27 May 2022
- 2022Testing Stationarity and Change Point Detection in Reinforcement Learning3 Mar 2022