A General Framework for Clustering and Distribution Matching with Bandit Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop a general framework for clustering and distribution matching problems with bandit feedback. We consider a K-armed bandit model where some subset of K arms is partitioned into M groups. Within each group, the random variable associated to each arm follows the same distribution on a finite alphabet. At each time step, the decision maker pulls an arm and observes its outcome from the random variable associated to that arm. Subsequent arm pulls depend on the history of arm pulls and their outcomes. The decision maker has no knowledge of the distributions of the arms or the underlying partitions. The task is to devise an online algorithm to learn the underlying partition of arms with the least number of arm pulls on average and with an error probability not exceeding a pre-determined value~δ. Several existing problems fall under our general framework, including finding M pairs of arms, odd arm identification, and N-ary clustering of K arms belong to our general framework. We derive a non-asymptotic lower bound on the average number of arm pulls for any online algorithm with an error probability not exceeding δ. Furthermore, we develop a computationally-efficient online algorithm based on the Track-and-Stop method and Frank--Wolfe algorithm, and show that the average number of arm pulls of our algorithm asymptotically matches that of the lower bound. Our refined analysis also uncovers a novel bound on the speed at which the average number of arm pulls of our algorithm converges to the fundamental limit as δ vanishes.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2024.
Builds on
11 of 37 references.
References · 11
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
- 2020Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measurescited by 17
- 2022Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedbackcited by 15
- 2021A Non-asymptotic Approach to Best-Arm Identification for Gaussian Banditscited by 7
- 2024Active clustering with bandit feedbackcited by 7
- 2018Adaptive Sampling for Coarse Rankingcited by 5
- 2022Optimal Clustering with Noisy Queries via Multi-Armed Banditcited by 5
- 2024Representative Arm Identification: A fixed confidence approach to identify cluster representativescited by 2
- 2024Large and Small Deviations for Statistical Sequence Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Manycited by 2
- 2025Online Clustering of Data Sequences with Bandit Informationcited by 1
- 2025Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedbackcited by 1
- 2025Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Banditscited by 0
- 2025A Distribution Testing Approach to Clustering Distributionscited by 0
- 2026Nonparametric Kernel Clustering with Bandit Feedbackcited by 0
- 2026Efficient Clustering in Stochastic Banditscited by 0
- 2026Efficient Clustering in Stochastic Bandits14 Jan 2026
- 2026Nonparametric Kernel Clustering with Bandit Feedback12 Jan 2026
- 2025A Distribution Testing Approach to Clustering Distributions9 Dec 2025
- 2025Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback11 Jul 2025
- 2025Near Optimal Best Arm Identification for Clustered Bandits15 May 2025
- 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Many14 Mar 2025
- 2025Online Clustering of Data Sequences with Bandit Information20 Jan 2025