mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Circumventing Safety Alignment in Large Language Models Through Embedding Space Toxicity Attenuation

arXiv 2507.08020 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across domains such as healthcare, education, and cybersecurity. However, this openness also introduces significant security risks, particularly through embedding space poisoning, which is a subtle attack vector where adversaries manipulate the internal semantic representations of input data to bypass safety alignment mechanisms. While previous research has investigated universal perturbation methods, the dynamics of LLM safety alignment at the embedding level remain insufficiently understood. Consequently, more targeted and accurate adversarial perturbation techniques, which pose significant threats, have not been adequately studied. In this work, we propose ETTA (Embedding Transformation Toxicity Attenuation), a novel framework that identifies and attenuates toxicity-sensitive dimensions in embedding space via linear transformations. ETTA bypasses model refusal behaviors while preserving linguistic coherence, without requiring model fine-tuning or access to training data. Evaluated on five representative open-source LLMs using the AdvBench benchmark, ETTA achieves a high average attack success rate of 88.61%, outperforming the best baseline by 11.34%, and generalizes to safety-enhanced models (e.g., 77.39% ASR on instruction-tuned defenses). These results highlight a critical vulnerability in current alignment strategies and underscore the need for embedding-aware defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 38 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.

Builds on

38 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Virus: Harmful Fine-tuning Attack for Large Language Models Bypassing Guardrail Moderation29 Jan
  2. 2024Soft Prompt Threats: Attacking Safety Alignment and Unlearning in Open-Source LLMs through the Embedding Space14 Feb
  3. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedback24 Nov
  4. 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations10 Oct

Other references · 34

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  10. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  11. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  12. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
22 more
  1. 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 435
  2. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 434
  3. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  4. 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 359
  5. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  6. 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4cited by 290
  7. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  8. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
  9. 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
  10. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 162
  11. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
  12. 2020Bullseye Polytope: A Scalable Clean-Label Poisoning Attack with Improved Transferabilitycited by 65
  13. 2024Fight Back Against Jailbreaking via Prompt Adversarial Tuningcited by 63
  14. 2023Spear Phishing With Large Language Modelscited by 49
  15. 2023Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Large Language Models: Old and New Threatscited by 49
  16. 2024Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detectioncited by 27
  17. 2024Exploring ChatGPT App Ecosystem: Distribution, Deployment and Securitycited by 10
  18. 2024Decoding Secret Memorization in Code LLMs Through Token-Level Characterizationcited by 9
  19. 2024Poisoning Attacks against Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 7
  20. 2024Understanding the Effectiveness of Coverage Criteria for Large Language Models: A Special Angle from Jailbreak Attackscited by 7
  21. 2025Navigating Semantic Drift in Task-Agnostic Class-Incremental Learningcited by 6
  22. 2025Jailbreaking LLMs' Safeguard with Universal Magic Words for Text Embedding Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models
  2. 2026Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment
  3. 2024Robustifying Safety-Aligned Large Language Models through Clean Data Curation
  4. 2025TRIDENT: Enhancing Large Language Model Safety with Tri-Dimensional Diversified Red-Teaming Data Synthesis
  5. 2025Safety Alignment Can Be Not Superficial With Explicit Safety Signals
  6. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
  7. 2025SABER: Uncovering Vulnerabilities in Safety Alignment via Cross-Layer Residual Connection
  8. 2024Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vector