mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRIDENT: Enhancing Large Language Model Safety with Tri-Dimensional Diversified Red-Teaming Data Synthesis

arXiv 2505.24672 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Safety of self-evolving systems

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various natural language processing tasks but remain vulnerable to generating harmful content or being exploited for malicious purposes. Although safety alignment datasets have been introduced to mitigate such risks through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), these datasets often lack comprehensive risk coverage. Most existing datasets focus primarily on lexical diversity while neglecting other critical dimensions. To address this limitation, we propose a novel analysis framework to systematically measure the risk coverage of alignment datasets across three essential dimensions: Lexical Diversity, Malicious Intent, and Jailbreak Tactics. We further introduce TRIDENT, an automated pipeline that leverages persona-based, zero-shot LLM generation to produce diverse and comprehensive instructions spanning these dimensions. Each harmful instruction is paired with an ethically aligned response, resulting in two datasets: TRIDENT-Core, comprising 26,311 examples, and TRIDENT-Edge, with 18,773 examples. Fine-tuning Llama 3.1-8B on TRIDENT-Edge demonstrates substantial improvements, achieving an average 14.29% reduction in Harm Score, and a 20% decrease in Attack Success Rate compared to the best-performing baseline model fine-tuned on the WildBreak dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety of self-evolving systems, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 34 references.

References · 20

  1. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  2. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  3. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  4. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  5. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  6. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  7. 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
  8. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
  9. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
  10. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easilycited by 242
  11. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attackscited by 208
  12. 2023Scalable and Transferable Black-Box Jailbreaks for Language Models via Persona Modulationcited by 202
8 more
  1. 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 201
  2. 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
  3. 2022Why Should Adversarial Perturbations be Imperceptible? Rethink the Research Paradigm in Adversarial NLPcited by 99
  4. 2024Does Refusal Training in LLMs Generalize to the Past Tense?cited by 74
  5. 2024The Multilingual Alignment Prism: Aligning Global and Local Preferences to Reduce Harmcited by 67
  6. 2023AART: AI-Assisted Red-Teaming with Diverse Data Generation for New LLM-powered Applicationscited by 53
  7. 2023SC-Safety: A Multi-round Open-ended Question Adversarial Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models in Chinesecited by 17
  8. 2024AbuseGPT: Abuse of Generative AI ChatBots to Create Smishing Campaignscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SafeTuneBed: A Toolkit for Benchmarking LLM Safety Alignment in Fine-Tuning
  2. 2025SABER: Uncovering Vulnerabilities in Safety Alignment via Cross-Layer Residual Connection
  3. 2025LLM-Safety Evaluations Lack Robustness
  4. 2026Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment
  5. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep
  6. 2024Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation
  7. 2024Robustifying Safety-Aligned Large Language Models through Clean Data Curation
  8. 2024Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!