Bridging the gap in FER: addressing age bias in deep learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Facial Expression Recognition (FER) systems based on deep learning have achieved impressive performance in recent years. However, these models often exhibit demographic biases, particularly with respect to age, which can compromise their fairness and reliability. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of age-related bias in deep FER models, with a particular focus on the elderly population. We first investigate whether recognition performance varies across age groups, which expressions are most affected, and whether model attention differs depending on age. Using Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, we identify systematic disparities in expression recognition and attention patterns, especially for "neutral", "sadness", and "anger" in elderly individuals. Based on these findings, we propose and evaluate three bias mitigation strategies: Multi-task Learning, Multi-modal Input, and Age-weighted Loss. Our models are trained on a large-scale dataset, AffectNet, with automatically estimated age labels and validated on balanced benchmark datasets that include underrepresented age groups. Results show consistent improvements in recognition accuracy for elderly individuals, particularly for the most error-prone expressions. Saliency heatmap analysis reveals that models trained with age-aware strategies attend to more relevant facial regions for each age group, helping to explain the observed improvements. These findings suggest that age-related bias in FER can be effectively mitigated using simple training modifications, and that even approximate demographic labels can be valuable for promoting fairness in large-scale affective computing systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.
Builds on
21 of 62 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 492
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 270
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
9 more
- 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
- 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
- 2023MiVOLO: Multi-input Transformer for Age and Gender Estimationcited by 42
- 2018Exploring Disentangled Feature Representation Beyond Face Identificationcited by 36
- 2022Shape Preserving Facial Landmarks with Graph Attention Networkscited by 23
- 2023Assessing Fidelity in XAI post-hoc techniques: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Explanations Datasetscited by 15
- 2024Unveiling the Human-like Similarities of Automatic Facial Expression Recognition: An Empirical Exploration through Explainable AIcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating Facial Expression Recognition Datasets for Deep Learning: A Benchmark Study with Novel Similarity Metricscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.