Mitigating Shortcut Learning with InterpoLated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Empirical risk minimization (ERM) incentivizes models to exploit shortcuts, i.e., spurious correlations between input attributes and labels that are prevalent in the majority of the training data but unrelated to the task at hand. This reliance hinders generalization on minority examples, where such correlations do not hold. Existing shortcut mitigation approaches are model-specific, difficult to tune, computationally expensive, and fail to improve learned representations. To address these issues, we propose InterpoLated Learning (InterpoLL) which interpolates the representations of majority examples to include features from intra-class minority examples with shortcut-mitigating patterns. This weakens shortcut influence, enabling models to acquire features predictive across both minority and majority examples. Experimental results on multiple natural language understanding tasks demonstrate that InterpoLL improves minority generalization over both ERM and state-of-the-art shortcut mitigation methods, without compromising accuracy on majority examples. Notably, these gains persist across encoder, encoder-decoder, and decoder-only architectures, demonstrating the method's broad applicability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.
Builds on
58 of 81 references.
References · 58
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
38 more
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
- 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 270
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
- 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
- 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 160
- 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
- 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 120
- 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
- 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
- 2020Syntactic Data Augmentation Increases Robustness to Inference Heuristicscited by 86
- 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
- 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
- 2021Towards Interpreting and Mitigating Shortcut Learning Behavior of NLU Modelscited by 78
- 2022GLUE-X: Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Models from an Out-of-distribution Generalization Perspectivecited by 72
- 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated Counterfactualscited by 67
- 2021Fairness via Representation Neutralizationcited by 63
- 2022Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 54
- 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
- 2021SSMix: Saliency-Based Span Mixup for Text Classificationcited by 39
- 2022On the Calibration of Pre-trained Language Models using Mixup Guided by Area Under the Margin and Saliencycited by 31
- 2023Don't blame Dataset Shift! Shortcut Learning due to Gradients and Cross Entropycited by 30
- 2019On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
- 2021End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Trainingcited by 24
- 2021CrossAug: A Contrastive Data Augmentation Method for Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 23
- 2021Debiasing Methods in Natural Language Understanding Make Bias More Accessiblecited by 17
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.