mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CREW-WILDFIRE: Benchmarking Agentic Multi-Agent Collaborations at Scale

arXiv 2507.05178 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2025cs.MA cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite rapid progress in large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems, current benchmarks fall short in evaluating their scalability, robustness, and coordination capabilities in complex, dynamic, real-world tasks. Existing environments typically focus on small-scale, fully observable, or low-complexity domains, limiting their utility for developing and assessing next-generation multi-agent Agentic AI frameworks. We introduce CREW-Wildfire, an open-source benchmark designed to close this gap. Built atop the human-AI teaming CREW simulation platform, CREW-Wildfire offers procedurally generated wildfire response scenarios featuring large maps, heterogeneous agents, partial observability, stochastic dynamics, and long-horizon planning objectives. The environment supports both low-level control and high-level natural language interactions through modular Perception and Execution modules. We implement and evaluate several state-of-the-art LLM-based multi-agent Agentic AI frameworks, uncovering significant performance gaps that highlight the unsolved challenges in large-scale coordination, communication, spatial reasoning, and long-horizon planning under uncertainty. By providing more realistic complexity, scalable architecture, and behavioral evaluation metrics, CREW-Wildfire establishes a critical foundation for advancing research in scalable multi-agent Agentic intelligence. All code, environments, data, and baselines will be released to support future research in this emerging domain.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 35 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2025.

Builds on

35 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024CAMON: Cooperative Agents for Multi-Object Navigation with LLM-based Conversations30 Jun
  2. 2024Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams19 Mar
  3. 2023Controlling Large Language Model-based Agents for Large-Scale Decision-Making: An Actor-Critic Approach23 Nov
  4. 2023Lyfe Agents: Generative agents for low-cost real-time social interactions3 Oct
  5. 2023Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models5 Jul
  6. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar

Other references · 29

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  3. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
  4. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
  5. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  6. 2022MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledgecited by 478
  7. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 415
  8. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 349
  9. 2017StarCraft II: A New Challenge for Reinforcement Learningcited by 274
  10. 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
  11. 2019The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Researchcited by 197
  12. 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 194
17 more
  1. 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  2. 2022Towards Human-Level Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation with Reinforcement Learningcited by 119
  3. 2023Scalable Multi-Robot Collaboration with Large Language Models: Centralized or Decentralized Systems?cited by 106
  4. 2023MindAgent: Emergent Gaming Interactioncited by 88
  5. 2024PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Taskscited by 82
  6. 2024LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 36
  7. 2022Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Warehouse Logistics with Robotic and Human Co-Workerscited by 30
  8. 2019Visual Hide and Seekcited by 13
  9. 2023From Simulations to Reality: Enhancing Multi-Robot Exploration for Urban Search and Rescuecited by 13
  10. 2024CREW: Facilitating Human-AI Teaming Researchcited by 11
  11. 2021Visual Perspective Taking for Opponent Behavior Modelingcited by 6
  12. 2020FireCommander: An Interactive, Probabilistic Multi-agent Environment for Heterogeneous Robot Teamscited by 4
  13. 2024Enabling Multi-Robot Collaboration from Single-Human Guidancecited by 3
  14. 2024GUIDE: Real-Time Human-Shaped Agentscited by 3
  15. 2025HIVEX: A High-Impact Environment Suite for Multi-Agent Research (extended version)cited by 2
  16. 2025Physiologically-Informed Predictability of a Teammate's Future Actions Forecasts Team Performancecited by 1
  17. 2025Perception of an AI Teammate in an Embodied Control Task Affects Team Performance, Reflected in Human Teammates' Behaviors and Physiological Responsescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Collab-Overcooked: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Language Models as Collaborative Agents
  2. 2026MASBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration under Partial Observability
  3. 2026T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario Agents in Real-World Domains
  4. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
  5. 2024Harnessing Language for Coordination: A Framework and Benchmark for LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Control
  6. 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
  7. 2025Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions
  8. 2025Can LLM Agents Solve Collaborative Tasks? A Study on Urgency-Aware Planning and Coordination