mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MASBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration under Partial Observability

arXiv 2610.04672 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have progressively evolved into the core of autonomous agents. Building on this progress, LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) coordinate multiple agents into a synergistic team to accomplish complex tasks that exceed the capabilities of individual agents. The effectiveness of such systems depends not only on the agents themselves, but also on how collaboration mechanisms are designed and organized. Note that real-world collaboration is typically partially observable, where each agent can only access partial information about the environment due to physical or privacy-related constraints. However, many existing multi-agent benchmarks assume global observability, and leave limited support for systematically evaluating collaboration mechanisms. To bridge this gap, we introduce MASBench, a multi-agent collaboration benchmark designed under partially observable constraints. It is organized into three progressive task categories: Reasoning, Scheduling, and Game. Through this structure, we progressively evaluate three representative collaboration mechanisms: Protocol, Memory, and Routing. MASBench further provides deterministic evaluation metrics, including performance score, communication cost, and cost effectiveness, to characterize both collaboration outcomes and communication overhead. Experiments across diverse LLM backbones and mechanism configurations offer empirical guidance for effective MAS design. Code is available at: https://github.com/BUPT-GAMMA/MASBench

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
  2. 2024BattleAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Cooperation and Competition Capabilities of Language Models in Multi-Agent Systems
  3. 2026ForestBench: A Unified Graph Framework for Evaluating Multi-Agent Collaboration
  4. 2026Silo-Bench: A Scalable Environment for Evaluating Distributed Coordination in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  5. 2025The Collaboration Gap: Exploration and Benchmarking of Open-World Agentic Cooperation
  6. 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Swarm intelligence
  7. 2026DPBench: Structural Determinants of Multi-Agent LLM Coordination Under Simultaneous Resource Contention
  8. 2025LLMs Working in Harmony: A Survey on the Technological Aspects of Building Effective LLM-Based Multi Agent Systems