mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PrivCert: Certifying Statement Support under Differential Privacy

arXiv 2609.38934 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially private (DP) text generation can protect individual records, but privacy alone does not specify what evidence a released statement carries about the underlying data. We identify this as an evidence gap: a private report may contain plausible claims without indicating whether they are strongly supported by the private dataset. We introduce PrivCert, a framework for privacy-preserving reporting that makes statement support explicit through privacy-preserving certificates and emit-or-abstain decisions. As a canonical instantiation, PrivCert-PF (Proposal-and-Filter) separates data-independent candidate discovery from private support certification, emitting only statements whose support passes a private evidence test. We provide theoretical grounding for this framework by characterizing the limits of implicit evidence under DP, deriving a sharp privacy--honesty frontier for single-statement certification, and establishing a worst-case cost for fine-grained multi-statement certification. Experiments on synthetic tasks and TAB, WildChat, and Yelp show that explicit certification maintains low unsupported emission, while free-text DP baselines frequently produce low-support claims under the same declared support semantics. We further show that the PrivCert contract can be realized with histogram, sparse-vector, and Gaussian mechanisms, and use DP synthetic data to illustrate an important boundary: support in a private proxy does not automatically certify support in the original data. Together, these results position privacy-preserving reporting as an evidence-design problem: not only how to generate private text, but what a private report can substantiate about its underlying data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  6. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
  7. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  8. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  9. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  10. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  11. 2022Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipecited by 108
  12. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 95
8 more
  1. 2024Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 2: Textcited by 76
  2. 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 72
  3. 2016Understanding the Sparse Vector Technique for Differential Privacycited by 27
  4. 2025InvisibleInk: High-Utility and Low-Cost Text Generation with Differential Privacycited by 10
  5. 2025Struct-Bench: A Benchmark for Differentially Private Structured Text Generationcited by 7
  6. 2025DP-Fusion: Token-Level Differentially Private Inference for Large Language Modelscited by 6
  7. 2025Urania: Differentially Private Insights into AI Usecited by 4
  8. 2025Toward provably private analytics and insights into GenAI usecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.