mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Linear Bandits: Lower Bounds and Algorithms

arXiv 2608.14319 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2026cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study quantum multi-armed bandits (QMAB) and quantum linear bandits (QLB), where the learner queries each arm or action through a quantum reward oracle or its inverse. Prior work gives algorithms over horizon T with regret O(Klog T) for QMAB with K arms and O(d2operatornamepolylog T) for d-dimensional QLB. This leaves open the optimal dependence on K and T and whether the dependence on d can be further improved. In this work, we prove the first tight minimax regret bound of Theta(Klog(1+T/K)) for QMAB and the first lower bound of Omega(dlog(1+T/d)) for finite-action QLB, ruling out regret independent of T. Our lower bounds rely on a high-confidence single-arm quantum testing lower bound for distinguishing a fixed reward mean from an interval of alternatives. A bandit-to-testing reduction then lifts it to the QMAB lower bound, while a linear embedding gives the finite-action QLB lower bound. The matching QMAB upper bound is obtained using a tail bound for the Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) estimator. For finite-action QLB, we propose a phased elimination algorithm that combines a low-bias low-variance quantum mean estimator with a small-support G-optimal design through a query allocation matched to the design weights. When the action set has size operatornamepoly(d), its regret is nearly linear in d and matches our lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Modelcited by 127
  2. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 100
  3. 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 91
  4. 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
  5. 2020Quantum exploration algorithms for multi-armed banditscited by 22
  6. 2017Near-Optimal Discrete Optimization for Experimental Design: A Regret Minimization Approachcited by 19
  7. 2022Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Stochastic Linear Bandits Enjoy Logarithmic Regretscited by 19
  8. 2020Quantum Banditscited by 18
  9. 2023Quantum Bayesian Optimizationcited by 12
  10. 2023Quantum Heavy-tailed Banditscited by 8
  11. 2024Linear bandits with polylogarithmic minimax regretcited by 8
  12. 2024Learning pure quantum states (almost) without regretcited by 6
4 more
  1. 2022A Sublinear-Time Quantum Algorithm for Approximating Partition Functionscited by 5
  2. 2025Quantum Lipschitz Banditscited by 4
  3. 2023Multi-Armed Bandits and Quantum Channel Oraclescited by 3
  4. 2025Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexitiescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.