mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

M3-Med: A Benchmark for Multi-lingual, Multi-modal, and Multi-hop Reasoning in Medical Instructional Video Understanding

arXiv 2507.04289 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid progress of artificial intelligence (AI) in multi-modal understanding, there is increasing potential for video comprehension technologies to support professional domains such as medical education. However, existing benchmarks suffer from two primary limitations: (1) Linguistic Singularity: they are largely confined to English, neglecting the need for multilingual resources; and (2) Shallow Reasoning: their questions are often designed for surface-level information retrieval, failing to properly assess deep multi-modal integration. To address these limitations, we present M3-Med, the first benchmark for Multi-lingual, Multi-modal, and Multi-hop reasoning in Medical instructional video understanding. M3-Med consists of medical questions paired with corresponding video segments, annotated by a team of medical experts. A key innovation of M3-Med is its multi-hop reasoning task, which requires a model to first locate a key entity in the text, then find corresponding visual evidence in the video, and finally synthesize information across both modalities to derive the answer. This design moves beyond simple text matching and poses a substantial challenge to a model's deep cross-modal understanding capabilities. We define two tasks: Temporal Answer Grounding in Single Video (TAGSV) and Temporal Answer Grounding in Video Corpus (TAGVC). We evaluated several state-of-the-art models and Large Language Models (LLMs) on M3-Med. The results reveal a significant performance gap between all models and human experts, especially on the complex multi-hop questions where model performance drops sharply. M3-Med effectively highlights the current limitations of AI models in deep cross-modal reasoning within specialized domains and provides a new direction for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.

Builds on

4 of 43 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  2. 2022Learning to Locate Visual Answer in Video Corpus Using Questioncited by 10
  3. 2024Learning to Unify Audio, Visual and Text for Audio-Enhanced Multilingual Visual Answer Localizationcited by 3
  4. 2025Ask2Loc: Learning to Locate Instructional Visual Answers by Asking Questionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Overview of the NLPCC 2025 Shared Task 4: Multi-modal, Multilingual, and Multi-hop Medical Instructional Video Question Answering Challenge
  2. 2026MedHorizon: Towards Long-context Medical Video Understanding in the Wild
  3. 2025Med-CRAFT: An Information System for Explainable and Configurable Construction of Multimodal Medical QA Datasets
  4. 2025MedAtlas: Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Round, Multi-Task Medical Reasoning Across Diverse Imaging Modalities and Clinical Text
  5. 2026LEMON: How Well Do MLLMs Perform Temporal Multimodal Understanding on Instructional Videos?
  6. 2025Lingshu: A Generalist Foundation Model for Unified Multimodal Medical Understanding and Reasoning
  7. 2025SMMILE: An Expert-Driven Benchmark for Multimodal Medical In-Context Learning
  8. 2026Med-CoReasoner: Reducing Language Disparities in Medical Reasoning via Language-Informed Co-Reasoning