When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pruning is widely used to reduce the complexity of deep learning models, but its effects on interpretability and representation learning remain poorly understood. This paper investigates how pruning influences vision models across three key dimensions: (i) interpretability, (ii) unsupervised object discovery, and (iii) alignment with human perception. We first analyze different vision network architectures to examine how varying sparsity levels affect feature attribution interpretability methods. Additionally, we explore whether pruning promotes more succinct and structured representations, potentially improving unsupervised object discovery by discarding redundant information while preserving essential features. Finally, we assess whether pruning enhances the alignment between model representations and human perception, investigating whether sparser models focus on more discriminative features similarly to humans. Our findings also reveal the presence of sweet spots, where sparse models exhibit higher interpretability, downstream generalization and human alignment. However, these spots highly depend on the network architectures and their size in terms of trainable parameters. Our results suggest a complex interplay between these three dimensions, highlighting the importance of investigating when and how pruning benefits vision representations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019Cross-Modal Self-Attention Network for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 263
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 240
- 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 230
- 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
- 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 126
- 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
8 more
- 2021Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep Networkscited by 82
- 2023Can Unstructured Pruning Reduce the Depth in Deep Neural Networks?cited by 20
- 2024When Does Perceptual Alignment Benefit Vision Representations?cited by 18
- 2017Interpreting Convolutional Neural Networks Through Compressioncited by 5
- 2023Less is More: The Influence of Pruning on the Explainability of CNNscited by 5
- 2022Towards Efficient Capsule Networkscited by 3
- 2023Exploring the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Explainability Methods: Insights into Sparse Network Performancecited by 2
- 2024Investigating the Effect of Network Pruning on Performance and Interpretabilitycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Explainability-Inspired Layer-Wise Pruning of Deep Neural Networks for Efficient Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026CutClean: Neural Network Pruning for Privacy-Preserving Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Transferring Visual Explanations: How Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation Affects Model Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Transferring Visual Explanations: How Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation Affects Model Interpretability20 Sep 2026
- 2026CutClean: Neural Network Pruning for Privacy-Preserving Inference13 Aug 2026
- 2026Explainability-Inspired Layer-Wise Pruning of Deep Neural Networks for Efficient Object Detection15 Feb 2026