Exploring the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Explainability Methods: Insights into Sparse Network Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discovering a high-performing sparse network within a massive neural network is advantageous for deploying them on devices with limited storage, such as mobile phones. Additionally, model explainability is essential to fostering trust in AI. The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) finds a network within a deep network with comparable or superior performance to the original model. However, limited study has been conducted on the success or failure of LTH in terms of explainability. In this work, we examine why the performance of the pruned networks gradually increases or decreases. Using Grad-CAM and Post-hoc concept bottleneck models (PCBMs), respectively, we investigate the explainability of pruned networks in terms of pixels and high-level concepts. We perform extensive experiments across vision and medical imaging datasets. As more weights are pruned, the performance of the network degrades. The discovered concepts and pixels from the pruned networks are inconsistent with the original network -- a possible reason for the drop in performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2023.
Builds on
34 of 48 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
22 more
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
- 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
- 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
- 2019Explanation by Progressive Exaggerationcited by 76
- 2022GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Modelscited by 73
- 2020Explaining Knowledge Distillation by Quantifying the Knowledgecited by 65
- 2022Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Offcited by 61
- 2022Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanationscited by 57
- 2021Entropy-based Logic Explanations of Neural Networkscited by 51
- 2020On Interpretability of Deep Learning based Skin Lesion Classifiers using Concept Activation Vectorscited by 39
- 2021Consistent Explanations by Contrastive Learningcited by 18
- 2021Learning Interpretation with Explainable Knowledge Distillationcited by 13
- 2019Dissecting Pruned Neural Networkscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?cited by 3
- 2025When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?2 Jul 2025