mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainability-Inspired Layer-Wise Pruning of Deep Neural Networks for Efficient Object Detection

arXiv 2602.14040 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in object detection tasks, but their increasing complexity poses significant challenges for deployment on resource-constrained platforms. While model compression techniques such as pruning have emerged as essential tools, traditional magnitude-based pruning methods do not necessarily align with the true functional contribution of network components to task-specific performance. In this work, we present an explainability-inspired, layer-wise pruning framework tailored for efficient object detection. Our approach leverages a SHAP-inspired gradient--activation attribution to estimate layer importance, providing a data-driven proxy for functional contribution rather than relying solely on static weight magnitudes. We conduct comprehensive experiments across diverse object detection architectures, including ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, ShuffleNetV2, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and YOLOv8, evaluating performance on the Microsoft COCO 2017 validation set. The results show that the proposed attribution-inspired pruning consistently identifies different layers as least important compared to L1-norm-based methods, leading to improved accuracy--efficiency trade-offs. Notably, for ShuffleNetV2, our method yields a 10% empirical increase in inference speed, whereas L1-pruning degrades performance by 13.7%. For RetinaNet, the proposed approach preserves the baseline mAP (0.151) with negligible impact on inference speed, while L1-pruning incurs a 1.3% mAP drop for a 6.2% speed increase. These findings highlight the importance of data-driven layer importance assessment and demonstrate that explainability-inspired compression offers a principled direction for deploying deep neural networks on edge and resource-constrained platforms while preserving both performance and interpretability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  3. 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
  4. 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
  5. 2023Less is More: The Influence of Pruning on the Explainability of CNNscited by 4
  6. 2025When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?cited by 3
  7. 2025Compressing Deep Neural Networks Using Explainable AIcited by 2
  8. 2024Sparse Explanations of Neural Networks Using Pruned Layer-Wise Relevance Propagationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.