Explainability-Inspired Layer-Wise Pruning of Deep Neural Networks for Efficient Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in object detection tasks, but their increasing complexity poses significant challenges for deployment on resource-constrained platforms. While model compression techniques such as pruning have emerged as essential tools, traditional magnitude-based pruning methods do not necessarily align with the true functional contribution of network components to task-specific performance. In this work, we present an explainability-inspired, layer-wise pruning framework tailored for efficient object detection. Our approach leverages a SHAP-inspired gradient--activation attribution to estimate layer importance, providing a data-driven proxy for functional contribution rather than relying solely on static weight magnitudes. We conduct comprehensive experiments across diverse object detection architectures, including ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, ShuffleNetV2, Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, and YOLOv8, evaluating performance on the Microsoft COCO 2017 validation set. The results show that the proposed attribution-inspired pruning consistently identifies different layers as least important compared to L1-norm-based methods, leading to improved accuracy--efficiency trade-offs. Notably, for ShuffleNetV2, our method yields a 10% empirical increase in inference speed, whereas L1-pruning degrades performance by 13.7%. For RetinaNet, the proposed approach preserves the baseline mAP (0.151) with negligible impact on inference speed, while L1-pruning incurs a 1.3% mAP drop for a 6.2% speed increase. These findings highlight the importance of data-driven layer importance assessment and demonstrate that explainability-inspired compression offers a principled direction for deploying deep neural networks on edge and resource-constrained platforms while preserving both performance and interpretability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
- 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
- 2023Less is More: The Influence of Pruning on the Explainability of CNNscited by 4
- 2025When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?cited by 3
- 2025Compressing Deep Neural Networks Using Explainable AIcited by 2
- 2024Sparse Explanations of Neural Networks Using Pruned Layer-Wise Relevance Propagationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.