AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of AI-generated video models has created a pressing need for robust and interpretable evaluation frameworks. Existing metrics are limited to producing numerical scores without explanatory comments, resulting in low interpretability and human evaluation alignment. To address those challenges, we introduce AIGVE-MACS, a unified model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation(AIGVE), which can provide not only numerical scores but also multi-aspect language comment feedback in evaluating these generated videos. Central to our approach is AIGVE-BENCH 2, a large-scale benchmark comprising 2,500 AI-generated videos and 22,500 human-annotated detailed comments and numerical scores across nine critical evaluation aspects. Leveraging AIGVE-BENCH 2, AIGVE-MACS incorporates recent Vision-Language Models with a novel token-wise weighted loss and a dynamic frame sampling strategy to better align with human evaluators. Comprehensive experiments across supervised and zero-shot benchmarks demonstrate that AIGVE-MACS achieves state-of-the-art performance in both scoring correlation and comment quality, significantly outperforming prior baselines including GPT-4o and VideoScore. In addition, we further showcase a multi-agent refinement framework where feedback from AIGVE-MACS drives iterative improvements in video generation, leading to 53.5% quality enhancement. This work establishes a new paradigm for comprehensive, human-aligned evaluation of AI-generated videos. We release the AIGVE-BENCH 2 and AIGVE-MACS at https://huggingface.co/xiaoliux/AIGVE-MACS.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.
Builds on
37 of 51 references.
References · 37
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,198
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
- 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,755
- 2022Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Datacited by 1,725
- 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,597
- 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,204
25 more
- 2021CogView: Mastering Text-to-Image Generation via Transformerscited by 691
- 2025VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understandingcited by 502
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
- 2024Pyramidal Flow Matching for Efficient Video Generative Modelingcited by 354
- 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 332
- 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 314
- 2023Show-1: Marrying Pixel and Latent Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 300
- 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 279
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2018A Note on the Inception Scorecited by 225
- 2024VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generationcited by 215
- 2023VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 196
- 2024VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generationcited by 190
- 2023Swap Attention in Spatiotemporal Diffusions for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 153
- 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 130
- 2024T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Modelscited by 66
- 2024Ctrl-Adapter: An Efficient and Versatile Framework for Adapting Diverse Controls to Any Diffusion Modelcited by 64
- 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2024Evaluation Agent: Efficient and Promptable Evaluation Framework for Visual Generative Modelscited by 41
- 2025FingER: Content Aware Fine-grained Evaluation with Reasoning for AI-Generated Videoscited by 22
- 2024A Survey of AI-Generated Video Evaluationcited by 17
- 2024Self-Correcting Text-to-Video Generation with Misalignment Detection and Localized Refinementcited by 13
- 2025AIGVE-Tool: AI-Generated Video Evaluation Toolkit with Multifaceted Benchmarkcited by 7
- 2024Light-VQA+: A Video Quality Assessment Model for Exposure Correction with Vision-Language Guidancecited by 6
- 2024The Value of AI-Generated Metadata for UGC Platforms: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experimentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LOVE: Benchmarking and Evaluating Text-to-Video Generation and Video-to-Text Interpretation
- 2025Q-Save: Towards Scoring and Attribution for Generated Video Evaluation
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Human-Centric Videos: Dataset and Model
- 2025VideoScore2: Think before You Score in Generative Video Evaluation
- 2024AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMM
- 2025UVE: Are MLLMs Unified Evaluators for AI-Generated Videos?
- 2024MSG Score: Automated Video Verification for Reliable Multi-Scene Generation
- 2025VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos