mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Value of AI-Generated Metadata for UGC Platforms: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment

arXiv 2412.18337 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2024econ.GN cs.AI cs.HCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-generated content (AIGC), such as advertisement copy, product descriptions, and social media posts, is becoming ubiquitous in business practices. However, the value of AI-generated metadata, such as titles, remains unclear on user-generated content (UGC) platforms. To address this gap, we conducted a large-scale field experiment on a leading short-video platform in Asia to provide about 1 million users access to AI-generated titles for their uploaded videos. Our findings show that the provision of AI-generated titles significantly boosted content consumption, increasing valid watches by 1.6% and watch duration by 0.9%. When producers adopted these titles, these increases jumped to 7.1% and 4.1%, respectively. This viewership-boost effect was largely attributed to the use of this generative AI (GAI) tool increasing the likelihood of videos having a title by 41.4%. The effect was more pronounced for groups more affected by metadata sparsity. Mechanism analysis revealed that AI-generated metadata improved user-video matching accuracy in the platform's recommender system. Interestingly, for a video for which the producer would have posted a title anyway, adopting the AI-generated title decreased its viewership on average, implying that AI-generated titles may be of lower quality than human-generated ones. However, when producers chose to co-create with GAI and significantly revised the AI-generated titles, the videos outperformed their counterparts with either fully AI-generated or human-generated titles, showcasing the benefits of human-AI co-creation. This study highlights the value of AI-generated metadata and human-AI metadata co-creation in enhancing user-content matching and content consumption for UGC platforms.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2024.

Builds on

3 of 57 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
  2. 2023LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendationcited by 172
  3. 2023Beyond Labels: Leveraging Deep Learning and LLMs for Content Metadatacited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.