The Value of AI-Generated Metadata for UGC Platforms: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI-generated content (AIGC), such as advertisement copy, product descriptions, and social media posts, is becoming ubiquitous in business practices. However, the value of AI-generated metadata, such as titles, remains unclear on user-generated content (UGC) platforms. To address this gap, we conducted a large-scale field experiment on a leading short-video platform in Asia to provide about 1 million users access to AI-generated titles for their uploaded videos. Our findings show that the provision of AI-generated titles significantly boosted content consumption, increasing valid watches by 1.6% and watch duration by 0.9%. When producers adopted these titles, these increases jumped to 7.1% and 4.1%, respectively. This viewership-boost effect was largely attributed to the use of this generative AI (GAI) tool increasing the likelihood of videos having a title by 41.4%. The effect was more pronounced for groups more affected by metadata sparsity. Mechanism analysis revealed that AI-generated metadata improved user-video matching accuracy in the platform's recommender system. Interestingly, for a video for which the producer would have posted a title anyway, adopting the AI-generated title decreased its viewership on average, implying that AI-generated titles may be of lower quality than human-generated ones. However, when producers chose to co-create with GAI and significantly revised the AI-generated titles, the videos outperformed their counterparts with either fully AI-generated or human-generated titles, showcasing the benefits of human-AI co-creation. This study highlights the value of AI-generated metadata and human-AI metadata co-creation in enhancing user-content matching and content consumption for UGC platforms.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2024.
Builds on
3 of 57 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Actcited by 6
- 2025AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluationcited by 4
- 2025Semi-Supervised Synthetic Data Generation with Fine-Grained Relevance Control for Short Video Search Relevance Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Improving Behavioral Alignment in LLM Social Simulations via Context Formation and Navigationcited by 0
- 2026Fortress: A Case Study in Stabilizing Search Recommendations via Temporal Data Augmentation and Feature Pruningcited by 0
- 2026Fortress: A Case Study in Stabilizing Search Recommendations via Temporal Data Augmentation and Feature Pruning14 May 2026
- 2026Improving Behavioral Alignment in LLM Social Simulations via Context Formation and Navigation4 Jan 2026
- 2025Semi-Supervised Synthetic Data Generation with Fine-Grained Relevance Control for Short Video Search Relevance Modeling20 Sep 2025
- 2025AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation2 Jul 2025
- 2025Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Act2 Jun 2025