mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

STCLocker: Deadlock Avoidance Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv 2506.23995 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2025cs.SE cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous Driving System (ADS) testing is essential to ensure the safety and reliability of autonomous vehicles (AVs) before deployment. However, existing techniques primarily focus on evaluating ADS functionalities in single-AV settings. As ADSs are increasingly deployed in multi-AV traffic, it becomes crucial to assess their cooperative performance, particularly regarding deadlocks, a fundamental coordination failure in which multiple AVs enter a circular waiting state indefinitely, resulting in motion planning failures. Despite its importance, the cooperative capability of ADSs to prevent deadlocks remains insufficiently underexplored. To address this gap, we propose the first dedicated Spatio-Temporal Conflict-Guided Deadlock Avoidance Testing technique, STCLocker, for generating DeadLock Scenarios (DLSs), where a group of AVs controlled by the ADS under test are in a circular wait state. STCLocker consists of three key components: Deadlock Oracle, Conflict Feedback, and Conflict-aware Scenario Generation. Deadlock Oracle provides a reliable black-box mechanism for detecting deadlock cycles among multiple AVs within a given scenario. Conflict Feedback and Conflict-aware Scenario Generation collaborate to actively guide AVs into simultaneous competition over spatial conflict resources (i.e., shared passing regions) and temporal competitive behaviors (i.e., reaching the conflict region at the same time), thereby increasing the effectiveness of generating conflict-prone deadlocks. We evaluate STCLocker on two types of ADSs: Roach, an end-to-end ADS, and OpenCDA, a module-based ADS supporting cooperative communication. Experimental results show that, on average, STCLocker generates more DLS than the best-performing baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 9 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.

Builds on

9 of 69 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehicles13 Sep

Other references · 8

  1. 2020V2VNet: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication for Joint Perception and Predictioncited by 292
  2. 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 212
  3. 2021End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning Coachcited by 194
  4. 2022PlanT: Explainable Planning Transformers via Object-Level Representationscited by 105
  5. 2021Pylot: A Modular Platform for Exploring Latency-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 33
  6. 2022Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled Systemscited by 19
  7. 2022DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided Fuzzingcited by 19
  8. 2022LawBreaker: An Approach for Specifying Traffic Laws and Fuzzing Autonomous Vehiclescited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directions
  2. 2023SAFR-AV: Safety Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles using Real World Data -- An end-to-end solution for real world data driven scenario-based testing for pre-certification of AV stacks
  3. 2026Teach-to-Crash: A Closed-Loop Student-Teacher LLM Framework for Collision-Inducing Test Scenario Generation
  4. 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs
  5. 2026Towards Safe Autonomous Driving: A Real-Time Motion Planning Algorithm on Embedded Hardware
  6. 2024Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems
  7. 2026Hierarchical Fault Localization for Autonomous Driving Systems with Hypothesis Validation and Intent Analysis ↗
  8. 2025REACT: Runtime-Enabled Active Collision-avoidance Technique for Autonomous Driving