When Test-Time Adaptation Meets Self-Supervised Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training on test-time data enables deep learning models to adapt to dynamic environmental changes, enhancing their practical applicability. Online adaptation from source to target domains is promising but it remains highly reliant on the performance of source pretrained model. In this paper, we investigate whether test-time adaptation (TTA) methods can continuously improve models trained via self-supervised learning (SSL) without relying on source pretraining. We introduce a self-supervised TTA protocol after observing that existing TTA approaches struggle when directly applied to self-supervised models with low accuracy on the source domain. Furthermore, we propose a collaborative learning framework that integrates SSL and TTA models, leveraging contrastive learning and knowledge distillation for stepwise representation refinement. We validate our method on diverse self-supervised models, including DINO, MoCo, and iBOT, across TTA benchmarks. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach in SSL, showing that it achieves competitive performance even without source pretraining.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.
Builds on
43 of 56 references.
References · 43
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
31 more
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,653
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,077
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 982
- 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
- 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 589
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2018Invariant Information Clustering for Unsupervised Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 455
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2022A Probabilistic Framework for Lifelong Test-Time Adaptationcited by 46
- 2024COME: Test-time adaption by Conservatively Minimizing Entropycited by 31
- 2023Continual-MAE: Adaptive Distribution Masked Autoencoders for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 30
- 2024Candidate Pseudolabel Learning: Enhancing Vision-Language Models by Prompt Tuning with Unlabeled Datacited by 20
- 2025Ranked Entropy Minimization for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 17
- 2023Knowledge Transfer from Vision Foundation Models for Efficient Training of Small Task-specific Modelscited by 15
- 2024Provable Contrastive Continual Learningcited by 13
- 2024Accessing Vision Foundation Models via ImageNet-1Kcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Test-Time Adaptation with Binary Feedback
- 2022Back to the Source: Diffusion-Driven Test-Time Adaptation
- 2025Test-Time Distillation for Continual Model Adaptation
- 2024Everything to the Synthetic: Diffusion-driven Test-time Adaptation via Synthetic-Domain Alignment
- 2025Test-Time Model Adaptation for Quantized Neural Networks
- 2025Adapt in the Wild: Test-Time Entropy Minimization with Sharpness and Feature Regularization
- 2026TTSR: Test-Time Self-Evolving via Reflection
- 2023Persistent Test-time Adaptation in Recurring Testing Scenarios