Exploring Artificial Intelligence Tutor Teammate Adaptability to Harness Discovery Curiosity and Promote Learning in the Context of Interactive Molecular Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study examines the impact of an Artificial Intelligence tutor teammate (AI) on student curiosity-driven engagement and learning effectiveness during Interactive Molecular Dynamics (IMD) tasks on the Visual Molecular Dynamics platform. It explores the role of the AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors in stimulating and sustaining student curiosity, affecting the frequency and complexity of student-initiated questions. The study further assesses how AI interventions shape student engagement, foster discovery curiosity, and enhance team performance within the IMD learning environment. Using a Wizard-of-Oz paradigm, a human experimenter dynamically adjusts the AI tutor teammate's behavior through a large language model. By employing a mixed-methods exploratory design, a total of 11 high school students participated in four IMD tasks that involved molecular visualization and calculations, which increased in complexity over a 60-minute period. Team performance was evaluated through real-time observation and recordings, whereas team communication was measured by question complexity and AI's curiosity-triggering and response behaviors. Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) metrics reflected structural alignment in coordination and were linked to communication behaviors. High-performing teams exhibited superior task completion, deeper understanding, and increased engagement. Advanced questions were associated with AI curiosity-triggering, indicating heightened engagement and cognitive complexity. CRQA metrics highlighted dynamic synchronization in student-AI interactions, emphasizing structured yet adaptive engagement to promote curiosity. These proof-of-concept findings suggest that the AI's dual role as a teammate and educator indicates its capacity to provide adaptive feedback, sustaining engagement and epistemic curiosity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.
Builds on
8 of 67 references.
References · 8
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2023The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AIcited by 87
- 2022GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skillscited by 29
- 2024Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learningcited by 17
- 2013Cross-Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Time Series: an R packagecited by 7
- 2022Conversational agents for fostering curiosity-driven learning in childrencited by 7
- 2024Generative AI as a metacognitive agent: A comparative mixed-method study with human participants on ICF-mimicking exam performancecited by 4
- 2025DeBiasMe: De-biasing Human-AI Interactions with Metacognitive AIED (AI in Education) Interventionscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Generative AI Expands the Intellectual Reach of Course Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs)
- 2025Thinking Like a Scientist: Can Interactive Simulations Foster Critical AI Literacy?
- 2025Resurrecting Socrates in the Age of AI: A Study Protocol for Evaluating a Socratic Tutor to Support Research Question Development in Higher Education
- 2026Examining Variation in How Guided AI Tutors Resolve Student Impasses
- 2026Regulating the AI Tutor: Intentions, Help-Seeking, and Self-Regulated Learning in Adolescent GenAI Use ↗
- 2026AI-Integrated Scientific Inquiry: A Practice-Centered Vision for Science Education
- 2025From Passive Tool to Socio-cognitive Teammate: A Conceptual Framework for Agentic AI in Human-AI Collaborative Learning
- 2026CogEvolution: A Human-like Generative Educational Agent to Simulate Student's Cognitive Evolution