mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Passive Tool to Socio-cognitive Teammate: A Conceptual Framework for Agentic AI in Human-AI Collaborative Learning

arXiv 2508.14825 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2025cs.HC cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving

Abstract (arXiv)

The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is undergoing a rapid transformation, moving beyond its historical function as an instructional tool towards a new potential as an active participant in the learning process. This shift is driven by the emergence of agentic AI, autonomous systems capable of proactive, goal-directed action. However, the field lacks a robust conceptual framework to understand, design, and evaluate this new paradigm of human-AI interaction in learning. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a novel conceptual framework (the APCP framework) that charts the transition from AI as a tool to AI as a collaborative partner. We present a four-level model of escalating AI agency within human-AI collaborative learning: (1) the AI as an Adaptive Instrument, (2) the AI as a Proactive Assistant, (3) the AI as a Co-Learner, and (4) the AI as a Peer Collaborator. Grounded in sociocultural theories of learning and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), this framework provides a structured vocabulary for analysing the shifting roles and responsibilities between human and AI agents. The paper further engages in a critical discussion of the philosophical underpinnings of collaboration, examining whether an AI, lacking genuine consciousness or shared intentionality, can be considered a true collaborator. We conclude that while AI may not achieve authentic phenomenological partnership, it can be designed as a highly effective functional collaborator. This distinction has significant implications for pedagogy, instructional design, and the future research agenda for AI in education, urging a shift in focus towards creating learning environments that harness the complementary strengths of both human and AI.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.

Builds on

13 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Evolution of AI in Education: Agentic Workflows25 Apr

Other references · 12

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  3. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  4. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183
  5. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 170
  6. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 169
  7. 2025Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming Supportcited by 34
  8. 2024Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learningcited by 17
  9. 2024The Effects of Generative AI Agents and Scaffolding on Enhancing Students' Comprehension of Visual Learning Analyticscited by 5
  10. 2025From Intuition to Understanding: Using AI Peers to Overcome Physics Misconceptionscited by 1
  11. 2025Novobo: Supporting Teachers' Peer Learning of Instructional Gestures by Teaching a Mentee AI-Agent Togethercited by 1
  12. 2025(AI peers) are people learning from the same standpoint: Perception of AI characters in a Collaborative Science Investigationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agentic AI and Pedagogical Best Practice: The Tension Between Automation and Learning
  2. 2026Agentivism: a learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence
  3. 2025Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning
  4. 2026An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling
  5. 2025Human Agency and Creativity in AI-Assisted Learning Environments ↗
  6. 2026Agentic AI Ecosystems in Higher Education: A Perspective on AI Agents to Emerging Inclusive, Agentic Multi-Agent AI Framework for Learning, Teaching and Institutional Intelligence
  7. 2026Addressing the Reality Gap: A Three-Tension Framework for Agentic AI Adoption
  8. 2026Why teaching resists automation in an AI-inundated era: Human judgment, non-modular work, and the limits of delegation