mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Thinking Like a Scientist: Can Interactive Simulations Foster Critical AI Literacy?

arXiv 2507.21090 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2025cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems shape individual and societal decisions, fostering critical AI literacy is essential. Traditional approaches, such as blog articles, static lessons, and social media discussions, often fail to support deep conceptual understanding and critical engagement. This study examines whether interactive simulations can help learners think like a scientist by engaging them in hypothesis testing, experimentation, and direct observation of AI behavior. In a controlled study with 605 participants, we assess how interactive AI tutorials impact learning of key concepts such as fairness, dataset representativeness, and bias in language models. Results show that interactive simulations effectively enhance AI literacy across topics, supporting greater knowledge transfer and self-reported confidence, though engagement alone does not predict learning. This work contributes to the growing field of AI literacy education, highlighting how interactive, inquiry-driven methodologies can better equip individuals to critically engage with AI in their daily lives.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 2 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.

Builds on

2 of 65 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023MAILS -- Meta AI Literacy Scale: Development and Testing of an AI Literacy Questionnaire Based on Well-Founded Competency Models and Psychological Change- and Meta-Competenciescited by 17
  2. 2024AI Thinking: A framework for rethinking artificial intelligence in practicecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Agency Gap in AI-Supported Writing: How Reactive and Proactive Agent Designs Shape Multimodal Reasoning
  2. 2025Integrating Universal Generative AI Platforms in Educational Labs to Foster Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy
  3. 2025Learning to Use AI for Learning: Teaching Responsible Use of AI Chatbot to K-12 Students Through an AI Literacy Module
  4. 2024AI Knowledge and Reasoning: Emulating Expert Creativity in Scientific Research
  5. 2026Rethinking Generative AI Literacy: An Integrative, Developmental, and Dialectical Framework for K-12 Teacher Education
  6. 2026AgentSchool: An LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Simulation for Education
  7. 2025Simulating Students with Large Language Models: A Review of Architecture, Mechanisms, and Role Modelling in Education with Generative AI
  8. 2025Bridging the AI Adoption Gap: Designing an Interactive Pedagogical Agent for Higher Education Instructors