PromptAug: Fine-grained Conflict Classification Using Data Augmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given the rise of conflicts on social media, effective classification models to detect harmful behaviours are essential. Following the garbage-in-garbage-out maxim, machine learning performance depends heavily on training data quality. However, high-quality labelled data, especially for nuanced tasks like identifying conflict behaviours, is limited, expensive, and difficult to obtain. Additionally, as social media platforms increasingly restrict access to research data, text data augmentation is gaining attention as an alternative to generate training data. Augmenting conflict-related data poses unique challenges due to Large Language Model (LLM) guardrails that prevent generation of offensive content. This paper introduces PromptAug, an innovative LLM-based data augmentation method. PromptAug achieves statistically significant improvements of 2% in both accuracy and F1-score on conflict and emotion datasets. To thoroughly evaluate PromptAug against other data augmentation methods we conduct a robust evaluation using extreme data scarcity scenarios, quantitative diversity analysis and a qualitative thematic analysis. The thematic analysis identifies four problematic patterns in augmented text: Linguistic Fluidity, Humour Ambiguity, Augmented Content Ambiguity, and Augmented Content Misinterpretation. Overall, this work presents PromptAug as an effective method for augmenting data in sensitive tasks like conflict detection, offering a unique, interdisciplinary evaluation grounded in both natural language processing and social science methodology.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.
Builds on
37 of 98 references.
References · 37
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 409
25 more
- 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
- 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
- 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 195
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 187
- 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 175
- 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 140
- 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 130
- 2018Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentationcited by 107
- 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
- 2017A Large Self-Annotated Corpus for Sarcasmcited by 64
- 2023Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiescited by 52
- 2023LLM-powered Data Augmentation for Enhanced Cross-lingual Performancecited by 51
- 2024Fine Tuning vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation for Less Popular Knowledgecited by 50
- 2020Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 49
- 2017Creating and Characterizing a Diverse Corpus of Sarcasm in Dialoguecited by 43
- 2023PromptMix: A Class Boundary Augmentation Method for Large Language Model Distillationcited by 25
- 2024Doing Personal LAPS: LLM-Augmented Dialogue Construction for Personalized Multi-Session Conversational Searchcited by 24
- 2024A Survey on Recent Advances in Conversational Data Generationcited by 23
- 2016Automatic Sarcasm Detection: A Surveycited by 21
- 2023Vicarious Offense and Noise Audit of Offensive Speech Classifiers: Unifying Human and Machine Disagreement on What is Offensivecited by 16
- 2025Shadows in the Attention: Contextual Perturbation and Representation Drift in the Dynamics of Hallucination in LLMscited by 9
- 2024Generate then Refine: Data Augmentation for Zero-shot Intent Detectioncited by 6
- 2023Data Augmentation for Conversational AIcited by 3
- 2020Trawling for Trolling: A Datasetcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLM-based Semantic Augmentation for Harmful Content Detection
- 2025Labels or Input? Rethinking Augmentation in Multimodal Hate Detection
- 2023"HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social media
- 2025Advancing Harmful Content Detection in Organizational Research: Integrating Large Language Models with Elo Rating System
- 2023NLP-LTU at SemEval-2023 Task 10: The Impact of Data Augmentation and Semi-Supervised Learning Techniques on Text Classification Performance on an Imbalanced Dataset
- 2025SMARTER: A Data-efficient Framework to Improve Toxicity Detection with Explanation via Self-augmenting Large Language Models
- 2025Synthetic vs. Gold: The Role of LLM Generated Labels and Data in Cyberbullying Detection
- 2023THOS: A Benchmark Dataset for Targeted Hate and Offensive Speech