mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-based Semantic Augmentation for Harmful Content Detection

arXiv 2504.15548 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.CL cs.CYcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on simple text classification tasks, frequently under zero-shot settings. However, their efficacy declines when tackling complex social media challenges such as propaganda detection, hateful meme classification, and toxicity identification. Much of the existing work has focused on using LLMs to generate synthetic training data, overlooking the potential of LLM-based text preprocessing and semantic augmentation. In this paper, we introduce an approach that prompts LLMs to clean noisy text and provide context-rich explanations, thereby enhancing training sets without substantial increases in data volume. We systematically evaluate on the SemEval 2024 multi-label Persuasive Meme dataset and further validate on the Google Jigsaw toxic comments and Facebook hateful memes datasets to assess generalizability. Our results reveal that zero-shot LLM classification underperforms on these high-context tasks compared to supervised models. In contrast, integrating LLM-based semantic augmentation yields performance on par with approaches that rely on human-annotated data, at a fraction of the cost. These findings underscore the importance of strategically incorporating LLMs into machine learning (ML) pipeline for social media classification tasks, offering broad implications for combating harmful content online.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

20 of 74 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
  7. 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 536
  8. 2020The Hateful Memes Challenge: Detecting Hate Speech in Multimodal Memescited by 485
  9. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  10. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 240
  11. 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 213
  12. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
8 more
  1. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 130
  2. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on a Highly-specialized Topic, Radiation Oncology Physicscited by 49
  3. 2023Are Large Language Models Ready for Healthcare? A Comparative Study on Clinical Language Understandingcited by 40
  4. 2024Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough?cited by 39
  5. 2024A Survey on Data Augmentation in Large Model Eracited by 31
  6. 2020ApplicaAI at SemEval-2020 Task 11: On RoBERTa-CRF, Span CLS and Whether Self-Training Helps Themcited by 16
  7. 2024Deciphering Political Entity Sentiment in News with Large Language Models: Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Strategiescited by 8
  8. 2024A comparative study of zero-shot inference with large language models and supervised modeling in breast cancer pathology classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.