Ensemble of Pathology Foundation Models for MIDOG 2025 Track 2: Atypical Mitosis Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mitotic figures are classified into typical and atypical variants, with atypical counts correlating strongly with tumor aggressiveness. Accurate differentiation is therefore essential for patient prognostication and resource allocation, yet remains challenging even for expert pathologists. Here, we leveraged Pathology Foundation Models (PFMs) pre-trained on large histopathology datasets and applied parameter-efficient fine-tuning via low-rank adaptation. In addition, we incorporated ConvNeXt V2, a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network architecture, to complement PFMs. During training, we employed a fisheye transform to emphasize mitoses and Fourier Domain Adaptation using ImageNet target images. Finally, we ensembled multiple PFMs to integrate complementary morphological insights, achieving competitive balanced accuracy on the Preliminary Evaluation Phase dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.
Builds on
7 of 21 references.
References · 7
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2021Learning domain-agnostic visual representation for computational pathology using medically-irrelevant style transfer augmentationcited by 26
- 2025Histologic Dataset of Normal and Atypical Mitotic Figures on Human Breast Cancer (AMi-Br)cited by 17
- 2025Benchmarking Deep Learning and Vision Foundation Models for Atypical vs. Normal Mitosis Classification with Cross-Dataset Evaluationcited by 7
- 2021Sk-Unet Model with Fourier Domain for Mitosis Detectioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.