mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finetuning a Weather Foundation Model with Lightweight Decoders for Unseen Physical Processes

arXiv 2506.19088 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in AI weather forecasting have led to the emergence of so-called "foundation models", typically defined by expensive pretraining and minimal fine-tuning for downstream tasks. However, in the natural sciences, a desirable foundation model should also encode meaningful statistical relationships between the underlying physical variables. This study evaluates the performance of the state-of-the-art Aurora foundation model in predicting hydrological variables, which were not considered during pretraining. We introduce a lightweight approach using shallow decoders trained on the latent representations of the pretrained model to predict these new variables. As a baseline, we compare this to fine-tuning the full model, which allows further optimization of the latent space while incorporating new variables into both inputs and outputs. The decoder-based approach requires 50% less training time and 35% less memory, while achieving strong accuracy across various hydrological variables and preserving desirable properties of the foundation model, such as autoregressive stability. Notably, decoder accuracy depends on the physical correlation between the new variables and those used during pretraining, indicating that Aurora's latent space captures meaningful physical relationships. In this sense, we argue that an important quality metric for foundation models in Earth sciences is their ability to be extended to new variables without a full fine-tuning. This provides a new perspective for making foundation models more accessible to communities with limited computational resources, while supporting broader adoption in Earth sciences.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

Builds on

12 of 25 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  2. 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,104
  3. 2020WeatherBench: A benchmark dataset for data-driven weather forecastingcited by 275
  4. 2023FuXi: A cascade machine learning forecasting system for 15-day global weather forecastcited by 241
  5. 2023WeatherBench 2: A benchmark for the next generation of data-driven global weather modelscited by 236
  6. 2024Poseidon: Efficient Foundation Models for PDEscited by 200
  7. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 166
  8. 2024ACE2: Accurately learning subseasonal to decadal atmospheric variability and forced responsescited by 54
  9. 2023AtmoRep: A stochastic model of atmosphere dynamics using large scale representation learningcited by 40
  10. 2024ORBIT: Oak Ridge Base Foundation Model for Earth System Predictabilitycited by 17
  11. 2025Building Machine Learning Limited Area Models: Kilometer-Scale Weather Forecasting in Realistic Settingscited by 13
  12. 2024WeatherGFM: Learning A Weather Generalist Foundation Model via In-context Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.