mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap

arXiv 2506.15699 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning has the potential to improve the safety of large language models (LLMs) by removing sensitive or harmful information post hoc. A key challenge in unlearning involves balancing between forget quality (effectively unlearning undesirable information) and retain quality (maintaining good performance on other, general tasks). Unfortunately, as we show, current LLM unlearning benchmarks contain highly disparate forget and retain sets -- painting a false picture of the effectiveness of LLM unlearning methods. This can be particularly problematic because it opens the door for benign perturbations, such as relearning attacks, to easily reveal supposedly unlearned knowledge once models are deployed. To address this, we present textttBLUR: a benchmark for LLM unlearning that provides more realistic scenarios of forget-retain overlap. textttBLUR significantly expands on existing unlearning benchmarks by providing extended evaluation tasks, combined forget/retain queries, and relearning datasets of varying degrees of difficulty. Despite the benign nature of the queries considered, we find that the performance of existing methods drops significantly when evaluated on textttBLUR, with simple approaches performing better on average than more recent methods. These results highlight the importance of robust evaluation and suggest several important directions of future study. Our benchmark is publicly available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/forgelab/BLUR

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 26 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

26 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?11 Oct
  2. 2024Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress3 Oct
  3. 2024An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety26 Sep
  4. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
  5. 2024Towards Scalable Exact Machine Unlearning Using Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning24 Jun
  6. 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
  7. 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models16 Jun
  8. 2024Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are Vulnerable30 May
  9. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  10. 2024Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning4 Apr
  11. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs26 Feb
  12. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
4 more
  1. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
  2. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearning17 Nov
  3. 2021Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearning17 Sep
  4. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun

Other references · 10

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  5. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
  6. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  7. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
  8. 2024Soft Prompt Threats: Attacking Safety Alignment and Unlearning in Open-Source LLMs through the Embedding Spacecited by 91
  9. 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 80
  10. 2022Making Recommender Systems Forget: Learning and Unlearning for Erasable Recommendationcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 13.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Unlearning That Lasts: Utility-Preserving, Robust, and Almost Irreversible Forgetting in LLMs
  2. 2025LLM Unlearning on Noisy Forget Sets: A Study of Incomplete, Rewritten, and Watermarked Data
  3. 2025SEPS: A Separability Measure for Robust Unlearning in LLMs
  4. 2026Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs
  5. 2025Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs
  6. 2024Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods
  7. 2025LLM Unlearning Reveals a Stronger-Than-Expected Coreset Effect in Current Benchmarks
  8. 2025OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics