Roles of Scaling and Instruction Tuning in Language Perception: Model vs. Human Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent large language models (LLMs) have revealed strong abilities to understand natural language. Since most of them share the same basic structure, i.e. the transformer block, possible contributors to their success in the training process are scaling and instruction tuning. However, how these factors affect the models' language perception is unclear. This work compares the self-attention of several existing LLMs (LLaMA, Alpaca and Vicuna) in different sizes (7B, 13B, 30B, 65B), together with eye saccade, an aspect of human reading attention, to assess the effect of scaling and instruction tuning on language perception. Results show that scaling enhances the human resemblance and improves the effective attention by reducing the trivial pattern reliance, while instruction tuning does not. However, instruction tuning significantly enhances the models' sensitivity to instructions. We also find that current LLMs are consistently closer to non-native than native speakers in attention, suggesting a sub-optimal language perception of all models. Our code and data used in the analysis is available on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 50 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
14 more
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 241
- 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
- 2019Attention Interpretability Across NLP Taskscited by 71
- 2022Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformercited by 63
- 2020Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?cited by 51
- 2021Incorporating Residual and Normalization Layers into Analysis of Masked Language Modelscited by 50
- 2020Improving Natural Language Processing Tasks with Human Gaze-Guided Neural Attentioncited by 45
- 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
- 2023Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictionscited by 42
- 2021Relative Importance in Sentence Processingcited by 22
- 2021Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjectscited by 10
- 2023Towards Modeling Human Attention from Eye Movements for Neural Source Code Summarizationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2023Instruction-tuning Aligns LLMs to the Human Braincited by 39
- 2024ELICIT: LLM Augmentation via External In-Context Capabilitycited by 7
- 2024Measuring Meaning Composition in the Human Brain with Composition Scores from Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Implicit Causality-biases in humans and LLMs as a tool for benchmarking LLM discourse capabilitiescited by 1
- 2025Improve Language Model and Brain Alignment via Associative Memorycited by 1
- 2025How Instruction-Tuning Imparts Length Control: A Cross-Lingual Mechanistic Analysiscited by 1
- 2025Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impactcited by 0
- 2025How Instruction-Tuning Imparts Length Control: A Cross-Lingual Mechanistic Analysis2 Sep 2025
- 2025Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impact18 Jun 2025
- 2025Improve Language Model and Brain Alignment via Associative Memory20 May 2025
- 2025Implicit Causality-biases in humans and LLMs as a tool for benchmarking LLM discourse capabilities22 Jan 2025
- 2024ELICIT: LLM Augmentation via External In-Context Capability12 Oct 2024
- 2024Measuring Meaning Composition in the Human Brain with Composition Scores from Large Language Models7 Mar 2024
- 2023Instruction-tuning Aligns LLMs to the Human Brain1 Dec 2023